Literature DB >> 27530806

Model-supported phototrophic growth studies with Scenedesmus obtusiusculus in a flat-plate photobioreactor.

Anja Pia Koller1, Hannes Löwe2, Verena Schmid1, Sabine Mundt3, Dirk Weuster-Botz1.   

Abstract

Light-dependent growth of microalgae can vary remarkably depending on the cultivation system and microalgal strain. Cell size and the pigmentation of each strain, as well as reactor geometry have a great impact on absorption and scattering behavior within a photobioreactor. In this study, the light-dependent, cell-specific growth kinetics of a novel green algae isolate, Scenedesmus obtusiusculus, was studied in a LED-illuminated flat-plate photobioreactor on a lab-scale (1.8 L, 0.09 m2 ). First, pH-controlled batch processes were performed with S. obtusiusculus at different constant incident photon flux densities. The best performance was achieved by illuminating S. obtusiusculus with 1400 μmol photons m-2  s-1 at the surface of the flat-plate photobioreactor, resulting in the highest biomass concentration (4.95 ± 0.16 gCDW  L-1 within 3.5 d) and the highest specific growth rate (0.22 h-1 ). The experimental data were used to identify the kinetic parameters of different growth models considering light inhibition for S. obtusiusculus. Light attenuation within the flat-plate photobioreactor was considered by varying light transfer models. Based on the identified kinetic growth model of S. obtusiusculus, an optimum growth rate of 0.22 h-1 was estimated at a mean integral photon flux density of 1072 μmol photons m-2  s-1 with the Beer-Lambert law and 1590 μmol photons m-2  s-1 with Schuster's light transfer model in the flat-plate photobioreactor. LED illumination was, thus, increased to keep the identified optimum mean integral photon flux density constant in the batch process assuming Schuster's light transfer model. Compared to the same constant incident photon flux density (1590 μmol photons m-2  s-1 ), biomass concentration was up to 24% higher using the lighting profile until a dry cell mass concentration of 14.4 ± 1.4 gCDW  L-1 was reached. Afterward, the biomass concentration remained constant, whereas cell growth continued in the batch process with constant incident photon flux density. Finally, biomass concentration was 15.5 ± 1.5 gCDW  L-1 and, thus, 7% higher compared to the corresponding batch process with lighting profile. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 308-320.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scenedesmus obtusiusculus; flat-plate photobioreactor; growth kinetics; light attenuation model; photodamage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530806     DOI: 10.1002/bit.26072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  6 in total

1.  Process Engineering Aspects for the Microbial Conversion of C1 Gases.

Authors:  Dirk Weuster-Botz
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 2.  Microalgae and cyanobacteria modeling in water resource recovery facilities: A critical review.

Authors:  Brian D Shoener; Stephanie M Schramm; Fabrice Béline; Olivier Bernard; Carlos Martínez; Benedek G Plósz; Spencer Snowling; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Borja Valverde-Pérez; Dorottya Wágner; Jeremy S Guest
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-12-28

3.  Computational Analysis of Dynamic Light Exposure of Unicellular Algal Cells in a Flat-Panel Photobioreactor to Support Light-Induced CO2 Bioprocess Development.

Authors:  Nicolò S Vasile; Alessandro Cordara; Giulia Usai; Angela Re
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Lab-scale photobioreactor systems: principles, applications, and scalability.

Authors:  Philipp Benner; Lisa Meier; Annika Pfeffer; Konstantin Krüger; José Enrique Oropeza Vargas; Dirk Weuster-Botz
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  A Newly Designed Automatically Controlled, Sterilizable Flat Panel Photobioreactor for Axenic Algae Culture.

Authors:  Tobias Fuchs; Nathanael D Arnold; Daniel Garbe; Simon Deimel; Jan Lorenzen; Mahmoud Masri; Norbert Mehlmer; Dirk Weuster-Botz; Thomas B Brück
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Bare Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Harvesting of Microalgae: From Interaction Behavior to Process Realization.

Authors:  Paula Fraga-García; Peter Kubbutat; Markus Brammen; Sebastian Schwaminger; Sonja Berensmeier
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.076

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.