| Literature DB >> 27530256 |
Jan Aaseth1,2, Jan Alexander3,4, Geir Bjørklund5, Knut Hestad1,2, Petr Dusek6, Per M Roos7,8, Urban Alehagen9.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder presenting one of the biggest healthcare challenges in developed countries. No effective treatment exists. In recent years the main focus of AD research has been on the amyloid hypothesis, which postulates that extracellular precipitates of beta amyloid (Aβ) derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP) are responsible for the cognitive impairment seen in AD. Treatment strategies have been to reduce Aβ production through inhibition of enzymes responsible for its formation, or to promote resolution of existing cerebral Aβ plaques. However, these approaches have failed to demonstrate significant cognitive improvements. Intracellular rather than extracellular events may be fundamental in AD pathogenesis. Selenate is a potent inhibitor of tau hyperphosphorylation, a critical step in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles. Some selenium (Se) compounds e.g. selenoprotein P also appear to protect APP against excessive copper and iron deposition. Selenoproteins show anti-inflammatory properties, and protect microtubules in the neuronal cytoskeleton. Optimal function of these selenoenzymes requires higher Se intake than what is common in Europe and also higher intake than traditionally recommended. Supplementary treatment with N-acetylcysteine increases levels of the antioxidative cofactor glutathione and can mediate adjuvant protection. The present review discusses the role of Se in AD treatment and suggests strategies for AD prevention by optimizing selenium intake, in accordance with the metal dysregulation hypothesis. This includes in particular secondary prevention by selenium supplementation to elderly with mild cognitive impairment.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Copper; Iron; Neuroinflammation; Selenium; Transmitters
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27530256 PMCID: PMC5034004 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-016-9959-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometals ISSN: 0966-0844 Impact factor: 2.949
Fig. 1Biotransformation of selenite and seleno-amino acids to selenide, selenoproteins and excretable metabolites. The reduction of selenite is facilitated by GSH, glutaredoxins, glutathione reductase and/or thioredoxin (Trx) and TrxR. It consumes reducing equivalents, NADPH. Selenate that is transported into cells by an anion transport mechanism (Jager et al. 2016), is also reduced to selenide, but the intracellular reduction of selenate to selenite is less efficient and not fully understood. Hydrogen selenide (HSe−) and methyl selenide (MeSe−) react with oxygen and thiols and complete the redox-cycle. Selenium can be incorporated specifically into selenoproteins via pathways from selenide and the synthesis of selenophosphate. Selenomethioneine can be converted to MeSe− or to selenocysteine via the transsulfuration pathway or unspecifically replace its sulfur analogue in proteins. Among excretory metabolites are selenosugars and at high doses dimethylselenide and trimethyl selenonium ion (TMSe+) (Alexander 2014)
Fig. 2Average daily selenium intake in various countries. Data are from Birgisdottir et al. (2013), Ellingsen et al. (2009), Fairweather-Tait et al. (2011), Vanderlelie and Perkins (2011); Rayman (2005), Maihara et al. (2004), Stoffaneller and Morse (2015). Because of import of wheat, Norway is slightly higher in Se intake than Denmark and Sweden. Optimization of selenoprotein P requires a daily intake of about 105 µg (Hurst et al. 2010), indicated by a dotted line
Fig. 3Intracellular detoxification by GPx and GSH. Toxic peroxides (R–OOH) are reduced to non-toxic R–OH by the action of the selenoenzymes glutathione peroxidases (A) in the presence of adequate amounts of the co-factor GSH found intracellularly, in contrast to the negligible GSH-levels found extracellularly. GSH is oxidized to its disulphide GSSG in this reaction. The reduced form GSH is regenerated by intracellular glutathione reductase (B) in the presence of NADPH2. This same co-factor, GSH, can also detoxify the compounds glyoxal and methylglyoxal which are neurotoxic byproducts of glucose metabolism, particularly in cases of insulin resistance. The latter reaction requires the presence of the glyoxalase enzyme system (Aaseth et al. 2016)