BACKGROUND: In hospitals, effective and efficient communication among care providers is critical to the provision of high-quality patient care. Yet, major problems impede communications including the frequent use of interruptive and one-way communication paradigms. This is especially frustrating for frontline providers given the dynamic nature of hospital care teams in an environment that is in constant flux. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post evaluation of a commercially available secured messaging mobile application on 4 hospital units at a single institution for over one year. We included care providers on these units: residents, hospitalists, fellows, nurses, social workers, and pharmacists. Utilization metrics and survey responses on clinician perceptions were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate. RESULTS: Between May 2013 and June 2014, 1,021 providers sent a total of 708,456 messages. About 85.5% of total threads were between two providers and the remaining were group messages. Residents and social workers/clinical resource coordinators were the largest per person users of this communication system, sending 9 (IQR 2-20) and 9 (IQR 2-22) messages per person per day, and receiving 18 (IQR 5-36) and 14 (IQR 5-29) messages per person per day, respectively (p=0.0001). More than half of the messages received by hospitalists, residents, and nurses were read within a minute. Communicating using secured messaging was found to be statistically significantly less disruptive to workflow by both nursing and physician survey respondents (p<0.001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Routine adoption of secured messaging improved perceived efficiency among providers on 4 hospital units. Our study suggests that a mobile application can improve communication and workflow efficiency among providers in a hospital. New technology has the potential to improve communication among care providers in hospitals.
BACKGROUND: In hospitals, effective and efficient communication among care providers is critical to the provision of high-quality patient care. Yet, major problems impede communications including the frequent use of interruptive and one-way communication paradigms. This is especially frustrating for frontline providers given the dynamic nature of hospital care teams in an environment that is in constant flux. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post evaluation of a commercially available secured messaging mobile application on 4 hospital units at a single institution for over one year. We included care providers on these units: residents, hospitalists, fellows, nurses, social workers, and pharmacists. Utilization metrics and survey responses on clinician perceptions were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate. RESULTS: Between May 2013 and June 2014, 1,021 providers sent a total of 708,456 messages. About 85.5% of total threads were between two providers and the remaining were group messages. Residents and social workers/clinical resource coordinators were the largest per person users of this communication system, sending 9 (IQR 2-20) and 9 (IQR 2-22) messages per person per day, and receiving 18 (IQR 5-36) and 14 (IQR 5-29) messages per person per day, respectively (p=0.0001). More than half of the messages received by hospitalists, residents, and nurses were read within a minute. Communicating using secured messaging was found to be statistically significantly less disruptive to workflow by both nursing and physician survey respondents (p<0.001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Routine adoption of secured messaging improved perceived efficiency among providers on 4 hospital units. Our study suggests that a mobile application can improve communication and workflow efficiency among providers in a hospital. New technology has the potential to improve communication among care providers in hospitals.
Authors: Shaun P Patel; Jay S Lee; David N Ranney; Shaza N Al-Holou; Christopher M Frost; Meredith E Harris; Sarah A Lewin; Erqi Liu; Arin Madenci; Allen A Majkrzak; Jessica Nelson; Sarah F Peterson; Kerri A Serecky; David A Wilkinson; Brandon M Wojcik; Michael J Englesbe; Raymond J Lynch Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Robert Wu; Peter Rossos; Sherman Quan; Scott Reeves; Vivian Lo; Brian Wong; Mark Cheung; Dante Morra Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jennifer A Przybylo; Ange Wang; Pooja Loftus; Kambria H Evans; Isabella Chu; Lisa Shieh Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Xinran Liu; Paul R Sutton; Rory McKenna; Mika N Sinanan; B Jane Fellner; Michael G Leu; Cris Ewell Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Guy Martin; Ankur Khajuria; Sonal Arora; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joy L Lee; Areeba Kara; Monica Huffman; Marianne S Matthias; Bethany Radecki; April Savoy; Jason T Schaffer; Michael Weiner Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 2.342