Literature DB >> 27529889

18F-NaF Positive Bone Metastases of Non 18F-FDG Avid Mucinous Gastric Cancer.

Çiğdem Soydal1, Elgin Özkan, Özlem Nuriye Küçük, Metin Kemal Kır.   

Abstract

Detection of gastric cancer bone metastasis is crucial since its presence is an independent prognostic factor. In this case report, we would like to present 18F-NaF positive bone metastases of non 18F-FDG avid gastric mucinous cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27529889      PMCID: PMC4745406          DOI: 10.4274/mirt.92400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther


INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer could metastasize to different sites prior to diagnosis. The rate of bone metastasis has been reported as 1% to 20% for gastric cancer (1,2,3). Detection of gastric cancer bone metastasis is crucial since its presence is an independent prognostic factor (4). In this report, we would like to present a case with gastric cancer bone metastases that could not be shown by 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

CASE REPORT

A 58 years old female patient with histopahologically proven gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma was referred to Ankara University Medical Faculty Department of Nuclear Medicine with a request of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging. The whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed approximately 1 hour after intravenous injection of 370 MBq 18F-FDG. PET/CT images were acquired with GE Discovery ST PET/CT scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). Emission PET images were reconstructed with non-contrast CT data for attenuation correction. In the evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images, there was no pathological uptake in the stomach and whole body except diffuse increase in gastric wall thickness (Figure 1). Multiple sclerotic bone lesions were detected in axial CT images (Figure 2). An 18F-NaF PET/CT was performed to exclude bone metastases. 18F-NaF PET/CT images were obtained by the same scanner and parameters with CT, approximately 30 minutes after intravenous injection of 135 MBq 18F-NaF from vertex to feet. Intense 18F-NaF uptake was seen in multiple sclerotic bone lesions in the vertebral column, sternum, ribs, scalp and both scapula (Figure 3).
Figure 1

Axial computed tomography, PET and whole body maximum intensity projection 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of the patient. There was no pathological uptake in the stomach or entire body

Figure 2

Sagittal computed tomography image of the patient. Multiple sclerotic lesions were seen in the entire skeleton

Figure 3

Whole body maximum intensity projection 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography image of the patient. Intense 18F-NaF uptake was seen in sclerotic bone lesions

LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION

18F-FDG PET/CT is a hybrid imaging modality used in the staging of several cancers. However, the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone metastases of gastric cancer is controversial (4,5,6,7,8,9,10). No algorithm has yet been defined to detect bone metastases of gastric cancer. In our case, bone metastases of gastric cancer could not be shown by 18F-FDG PET/CT. In our case, we suspected bone metastases of gastric cancer in spite of lack of 18F-FDG uptake, because absence of uptake in the primary tumor was probably related to the mucinous component and sclerotic pattern of bone lesions. For these reasons an 18F-NaF PET/CT was performed to evaluate bone lesions, and 18F-NaF PET/CT confirmed bone metastases. Conventional staging modalities such as bone scintigraphy are more valuable especially in patients with non 18F-FDG avid tumors. Various imaging methods including 18F-FDG PET/CT, whole body bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging and CT could be utilized to detect bone metastases. Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy is the traditional method to evaluate bone metastases of several cancers with low cost (5). The poor spatial resolution and longer duration of the examination result in limitations to bone scintigraphy. High quality images of the skeleton can be obtained within one hour after intravenous injection of 18F-NaF (6). In a recent study, Iagaru et al. (7) have reported that 18F-NaF PET/CT is superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone metastases. An advantage of combined PET/CT systems is that they provide skeletal system evaluation with highly sensitive and specific images (8). During evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images, skeletal lesions could be seen in CT series and these lesions could be evaluated by other methods to show bone metastases. In patients with non 18F-FDG avid tumors that could often metastasize to bone, CT series should be carefully evaluated to search bone lesions. Informed Consent: It was taken, Concept: Çiğdem Soydal, Design: Çiğdem Soydal, Data Collection or Processing: Elgin Özkan, Analysis or Interpretation: Çiğdem Soydal, Özlem Nuriye Küçük, Literature Search: Çiğdem Soydal, Metin Kemal Kır, Writing: Çiğdem Soydal, Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed, Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors, Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
  10 in total

1.  [Clinicopathological study of gastric cancer with bone metastasis].

Authors:  H Nishidoi; S Koga
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1987-05

2.  FDG-PET in a case of multiple bone metastases of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takako Nakai; Chio Okuyama; Takao Kubota; Yo Ushijima; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 3.  Bone scintigraphy and the added value of SPECT (single photon emission tomography) in detecting skeletal lesions.

Authors:  G Savelli; L Maffioli; M Maccauro; E De Deckere; E Bombardieri
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-03

4.  A case of bone marrow recurrence from gastric carcinoma after a nine-year disease-free interval.

Authors:  N Noda; T Sano; K Shirao; H Ono; H Katai; M Sasako; K Maruyama
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; Keiichirou Yamaguchi; Kazuo Kubota; Toshiyuki Saginoya; Tetsuro Yamazaki; Tatuo Ido; Gengo Yamaura; Hiromu Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Ryunosuke Kanamaru
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Pilot prospective evaluation of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI for detection of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Phillip Young; Erik Mittra; David W Dick; Robert Herfkens; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 7.  Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer.

Authors:  Frederick D Grant; Frederic H Fahey; Alan B Packard; Royal T Davis; Abass Alavi; S Ted Treves
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Bone metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Yoshikawa; H Kitaoka
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1983-05

9.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Barry A Siegel; Dawei Liu; Anthony F Shields; Ilana F Gareen; Lucy Hanna; Sharon Hartson Stine; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Ur Metser; Gideon Flusser; Limor Zuriel; Yehuda Kollender; Hedva Lerman; Gennady Lievshitz; Ilan Ron; Eyal Mishani
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.