Gabriel Ferreira Nicoloso1, Isabel Garcia Pötter1, Rachel de Oliveira Rocha2, Francisco Montagner3, Luciano Casagrande4. 1. Specialist in Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2. Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. 3. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 4. Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental trauma and deep caries are frequent findings in children and adolescents that may lead to pulp necrosis in young permanent teeth. As a consequence, the root stops its development, and managing these immature teeth becomes challenging due to the presence of open apexes and fragile dentinal walls. AIM: We aimed to carry out a systematic review including a meta-analysis to compare the endodontic treatments available in the management of immature necrotic permanent teeth and determine which one provides the best clinical and radiographic outcomes. DESIGN: The literature was screened via PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials databases until August 2015 to select randomized clinical trials that compared at least two different treatments regarding immature necrotic permanent teeth comprising clinical and radiographic success as outcome. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and evaluation of the articles. A total of 648 studies were retrieved from the databases, in which only 14 were selected to full-text analysis by the appliance of inclusion criteria. After the exclusion criteria, the remaining seven studies had their data extracted and assessed for bias risk. Pooled-effect estimates were obtained comparing clinical and radiographic success rates among MTA Versus other treatments. RESULTS: Evaluation of clinical (Z = 2.32, P = 0.02, OR = 5.37, 95% CI: 1.29-22.23, I = 0%) and radiographic (Z = 2.45, P = 0.01, OR = 4.31, 95% CI: 1.34-13.82, I = 0%) outcomes favored the MTA (control group) when compared to other endodontic treatments (P < 0.05). No evidence of heterogeneity was detected among the studies (I < 50%), whereas a moderate risk of bias was identified in five of them. CONCLUSIONS: Although almost all of the identified studies presented moderate risk of bias, MTA apexification seems to produce overall better clinical and radiographic success rates among the endodontic treatment available in immature necrotic permanent teeth.
BACKGROUND: Dental trauma and deep caries are frequent findings in children and adolescents that may lead to pulp necrosis in young permanent teeth. As a consequence, the root stops its development, and managing these immature teeth becomes challenging due to the presence of open apexes and fragile dentinal walls. AIM: We aimed to carry out a systematic review including a meta-analysis to compare the endodontic treatments available in the management of immature necrotic permanent teeth and determine which one provides the best clinical and radiographic outcomes. DESIGN: The literature was screened via PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials databases until August 2015 to select randomized clinical trials that compared at least two different treatments regarding immature necrotic permanent teeth comprising clinical and radiographic success as outcome. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and evaluation of the articles. A total of 648 studies were retrieved from the databases, in which only 14 were selected to full-text analysis by the appliance of inclusion criteria. After the exclusion criteria, the remaining seven studies had their data extracted and assessed for bias risk. Pooled-effect estimates were obtained comparing clinical and radiographic success rates among MTA Versus other treatments. RESULTS: Evaluation of clinical (Z = 2.32, P = 0.02, OR = 5.37, 95% CI: 1.29-22.23, I = 0%) and radiographic (Z = 2.45, P = 0.01, OR = 4.31, 95% CI: 1.34-13.82, I = 0%) outcomes favored the MTA (control group) when compared to other endodontic treatments (P < 0.05). No evidence of heterogeneity was detected among the studies (I < 50%), whereas a moderate risk of bias was identified in five of them. CONCLUSIONS: Although almost all of the identified studies presented moderate risk of bias, MTA apexification seems to produce overall better clinical and radiographic success rates among the endodontic treatment available in immature necrotic permanent teeth.