| Literature DB >> 27529625 |
Filipe Fernandes Oliveira Dantas1,2, Maria do Socorro Brasileiro-Santos1,2, Rafael Marinho Falcão Batista1,2, Leone Severino do Nascimento1,2, Lúcio Roberto Cançado Castellano3, Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias4, Kenio Costa Lima5, Amilton da Cruz Santos1,2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of strength training on oxidative stress and the correlation of the same with forearm vasodilatation and mean blood pressure of hypertensive elderly women, at rest (basal) and during a static handgrip exercise. Insufficiently active hypertensive elderly women (N = 25; mean age = 66.1 years) were randomized into a 10 week strength training group (n = 13) or control (n = 12) group. Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), plasma nitrite (NO2-), forearm blood flow (FBF), mean blood pressure (MBP) and vascular conductance ([FBF / MBP] x 100) were evaluated before and after the completion of the interventions. The strength training group increased the TAC (pre: Median = 39.0; Interquartile range = 34.0-41.5% vs post: Median = 44.0; Interquartile range = 38.0-51.5%; p = 0.006) and reduced the MDA (pre: 4.94 ± 1.10 μM vs post: 3.90 ± 1.35 μM; p = 0.025; CI-95%: -1.92 --0.16 μM). The strength training group increased basal vascular conductance (VC) (pre: 3.56 ±0.88 units vs post: 5.21 ±1.28 units; p = 0.001; CI-95%: 0.93-2.38 units) and decreased basal MBP (pre: 93.1 ±6.3 mmHg vs post: 88.9 ±5.4 mmHg; p = 0.035; CI-95%: -8.0 --0.4 mmHg). Such changes were also observed during static handgrip exercise. A moderate correlation was observed between changes in basal VC and MBP with changes in NO2- (ΔVC → r = -0.56, p = 0.047; ΔMBP → r = -0.41, p = 0.168) and MDA (ΔVC → r = 0.64, p = 0.019; ΔMBP → r = 0.31, p = 0.305). The strength training program reduced the oxidative stress of the hypertensive elderly women and this reduction was moderately correlated with their cardiovascular benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ensaiosclinicos.gov.br RBR-48c29w.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27529625 PMCID: PMC4986983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
General characteristics of hypertensive elderly women.
| Variables | ST group (n = 13) | Control group (n = 12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 28.6 ± 3.2 | 28.4 ± 3.0 | 27.7 ± 3.7 | 27.6 ± 3.8 | 0.550 |
| Bench Press exercise (1RM load–Kg) | 23.1 ± 4.8 | 32.5 ± 5.9 | 22.3 ± 4.8 | 21.7 ± 4.3 | |
| Seated Leg Press exercise (1RM load–Kg) | 57.5 ± 25.7 | 83.7 ± 25.1 | 62.0 ± 13.9 | 60.4 ± 13.4 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 142.9 ± 13.1 | 137.1 ± 12.2 | 139.9 ± 10.3 | 144.9 ± 14.1 | 0.050 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 68.2 ± 6.2 | 64.9 ± 5.1 | 67.4 ± 9.5 | 72.0 ± 7.7 | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 100.5 ± 13.7 | 97.8 ± 11.7 | 86.7 ± 11.0 | 89.2 ± 14.2 | 0.257 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 218.2 ± 32.3 | 215.5 ± 40.1 | 225.2 ± 50.9 | 213.3 ± 47.5 | 0.646 |
| HDL–Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 46.8 ± 8.1 | 55.0 ± 7.6 | 45.6 ± 12.1 | 46.4 ± 9.6 | 0.096 |
| LDL–Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 138.2 ± 29.2 | 127.8 ± 37.4 | 148.3 ± 47.4 | 138.8 ± 38.9 | 0.963 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 166.7 ± 61.6 | 162.5 ± 73.2 | 157.7 ± 44.9 | 141.4 ± 42.1 | 0.459 |
| Beta blockers (n,%) | 2 (8.0) | 3 (12.0) | |||
| Alpha-2 agonist (n,%) | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0) | |||
| 3 (12.0) | 3 (12.0) | ||||
| ACE inhibitors (n,%) | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0) | |||
| Thiazide diuretics + Antagonists of angiotensin II (n,%) | 2 (8.0) | 3 (12.0) | |||
| Thiazide diuretics + ACE inhibitors (n,%) | 2 (8.0) | 3 (12.0) | |||
| Antagonists of angiotensin II + Calcium channel antagonists (n,%) | 2 (8.0) | 0 (0) | |||
Note: ACE: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme. Values are mean ± SD or percentages. Bold values represent significant interaction.
* p < 0.05 between periods within group
‡ p < 0.05 between groups within period.
Fig 1Participant flow through study.
Fig 2Changes in blood markers of the hypertensive elderly women.
Note: NO2- = plasma nitrite; MDA = plasma malondialdehyde; TAC = total antioxidant capacity. The values in panel A (boxplot A) and C (boxplot C) represent the median and interquartile range. The values in panel B represent the mean and SD. * p < 0,05 between groups; † p < 0,05 within the group.
Fig 3Correlations between changes in the blood markers of the strength training group with their values at the pre-intervention period.
Note: NO2- = plasma nitrite; MDA = plasma malondialdehyde; TAC = total antioxidant capacity. Panel A and C–Spearman’s correlation coefficient; Panel B—Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Fig 4Correlation between changes in the plasma malondialdehyde concentration with changes in the plasma nitrite concentration of the strength training group.
Note: NO2- = plasma nitrite; MDA = plasma malondialdehyde; r = Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Changes in mean blood pressure, forearm blood flow and vascular conductance at basal and during three minutes of static handgrip exercise in the elderly hypertensive women.
| Basal | Minute 1 | Minute 2 | Minute 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | |||||
| ST group | Pre | 93.1 ±6.3 | 95.3 ±7.0 | 100.7 ±6.4 | 104.5 ±5.8 |
| Post | 88.9 ±5.4 | 92.9 ±4.7 | 95.9 ±4.9 | 99.1 ±4.6 | |
| Control group | Pre | 91.6 ±8.7 | 94.0 ±6.6 | 99.5 ±6.0 | 104.9 ±5.6 |
| Post | 95.9 ±7.8 | 99.3 ±8.5 | 102.8 ±8.3 | 109.4 ±9.7 | |
| Forearm blood flow (ml.min-1.100ml-1) | |||||
| ST group | Pre | 3.29 ±0.71 | 3.51 ±0.95 | 3.82 ±1.03 | 4.02 ±1.25 |
| Post | 4.62 ±1.07 | 4.82 ±1.05 | 5.06 ±1.08 | 5.28 ±1.04 | |
| Control group | Pre | 3.46 ±0.51 | 3.61 ±0.85 | 3.80 ±0.85 | 4.10 ±0.92 |
| Post | 3.21 ±0.83 | 3.23 ±0.89 | 3.35 ±1.09 | 3.59 ±1.12 | |
| Vascular conductance (units) | |||||
| ST group | Pre | 3.56 ±0.88 | 3.71 ±1.07 | 3.80 ±1.07 | 3.84 ±1.22 |
| Post | 5.21 ±1.28 | 5.21 ±1.21 | 5.29 ±1.20 | 5.33 ±1.08 | |
| Control group | Pre | 3.81 ±0.68 | 3.85 ±0.85 | 3.81 ±0.78 | 3.91 ±0.82 |
| Post | 3.37 ±0.96 | 3.28 ±0.99 | 3.29 ±1.15 | 3.32 ±1.10 | |
* p < 0.05 between periods within group
† p < 0.05 with respect to basal
‡ p < 0.05 between groups within period.
Correlations between changes in the basal vascular conductance and mean blood pressure with changes in the blood markers of the strength training group.
| ΔNO2- | ΔMDA | ΔTAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.56 | 0.64 | -0.18 | |
| -0.41 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
Note: ΔVC–basal vascular conductance (post–pre); ΔMBP–basal mean blood pressure (post–pre); ΔNO2- - plasma nitrite (post–pre); ΔMDA–plasma malondialdehyde (post–pre); ΔTAC–total antioxidant capacity (post–pre).
* Significant Pearson's correlation coefficient (p < 0.05).
Fig 5Correlations between changes in the vascular conductance values with the changes in the plasma nitrite and plasma malondialdehyde values.
Note: ΔCV–basal vascular conductance (post–pre); ΔNO2- - plasma nitrite (post–pre); ΔMDA–plasma malondialdehyde (post–pre); Panel A–adjusted R2 = 0.25; Panel B–adjusted R2 = 0.36.