Literature DB >> 27528617

Regulation of Cellular Dynamics and Chromosomal Binding Site Preference of Linker Histones H1.0 and H1.X.

Mitsuru Okuwaki1, Mayumi Abe2, Miharu Hisaoka3, Kyosuke Nagata3.   

Abstract

Linker histones play important roles in the genomic organization of mammalian cells. Of the linker histone variants, H1.X shows the most dynamic behavior in the nucleus. Recent research has suggested that the linker histone variants H1.X and H1.0 have different chromosomal binding site preferences. However, it remains unclear how the dynamics and binding site preferences of linker histones are determined. Here, we biochemically demonstrated that the DNA/nucleosome and histone chaperone binding activities of H1.X are significantly lower than those of other linker histones. This explains why H1.X moves more rapidly than other linker histones in vivo Domain swapping between H1.0 and H1.X suggests that the globular domain (GD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) of H1.X independently contribute to the dynamic behavior of H1.X. Our results also suggest that the N-terminal domain (NTD), GD, and CTD cooperatively determine the preferential binding sites, and the contribution of each domain for this determination is different depending on the target genes. We also found that linker histones accumulate in the nucleoli when the nucleosome binding activities of the GDs are weak. Our results contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms of dynamic behaviors, binding site selection, and localization of linker histones.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27528617      PMCID: PMC5064216          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00200-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  48 in total

1.  H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain.

Authors:  John P H Th'ng; Rohyun Sung; Ming Ye; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  In vitro binding of H1 histone subtypes to nucleosomal organized mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat promotor.

Authors:  H Talasz; N Sapojnikova; W Helliger; H Lindner; B Puschendorf
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-11-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A major nucleolar protein, nucleolin, induces chromatin decondensation by binding to histone H1.

Authors:  M S Erard; P Belenguer; M Caizergues-Ferrer; A Pantaloni; F Amalric
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1988-08-15

4.  A preference of histone H1 for methylated DNA.

Authors:  M McArthur; J O Thomas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Regulation of nucleolar chromatin by B23/nucleophosmin jointly depends upon its RNA binding activity and transcription factor UBF.

Authors:  Miharu Hisaoka; Shuhei Ueshima; Kensaku Murano; Kyosuke Nagata; Mitsuru Okuwaki
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  NAP1 modulates binding of linker histone H1 to chromatin and induces an extended chromatin fiber conformation.

Authors:  J Felix Kepert; Jacek Mazurkiewicz; Gerrit L Heuvelman; Katalin Fejes Tóth; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Prothymosin alpha modulates the interaction of histone H1 with chromatin.

Authors:  Z Karetsou; R Sandaltzopoulos; M Frangou-Lazaridis; C Y Lai; O Tsolas; P B Becker; T Papamarcaki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Photobleaching studies reveal that a single amino acid polymorphism is responsible for the differential binding affinities of linker histone subtypes H1.1 and H1.5.

Authors:  Thomas W Flanagan; Jacob K Files; Kelsey Rose Casano; Eric M George; David T Brown
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Concerted evolution of the tandem array encoding primate U2 snRNA occurs in situ, without changing the cytological context of the RNU2 locus.

Authors:  T Pavelitz; L Rusché; A G Matera; J M Scharf; A M Weiner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  DNA methylation affects nuclear organization, histone modifications, and linker histone binding but not chromatin compaction.

Authors:  Nick Gilbert; Inga Thomson; Shelagh Boyle; James Allan; Bernard Ramsahoye; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Assembly and remodeling of viral DNA and RNA replicons regulated by cellular molecular chaperones.

Authors:  Takeshi Sekiya; Yifan Hu; Kohsuke Kato; Mitsuru Okuwaki; Atsushi Kawaguchi; Kyosuke Nagata
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-11-22

2.  The Highest Density of Phosphorylated Histone H1 Appeared in Prophase and Prometaphase in Parallel with Reduced H3K9me3, and HDAC1 Depletion Increased H1.2/H1.3 and H1.4 Serine 38 Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Soňa Legartová; Gabriela Lochmanová; Eva Bártová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Temporally and Spatially Regulated Expression of the Linker Histone H1fx During Mouse Development.

Authors:  Keiko Ichihara-Tanaka; Kenji Kadomatsu; Satoshi Kishida
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 4.  H1.0 Linker Histone as an Epigenetic Regulator of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Di Liegro; Gabriella Schiera; Italia Di Liegro
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  SUMO1 modification of histone H4 is involved in the pathogenesis of nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Li Guo; Bingyu Li; Xun Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.