Patricia M Howse1, Lyudmila N Chibrikova2, Laurie K Twells3, Brendan J Barrett1, John-Michael Gamble4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada. 2. School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada; School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada. 4. School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada. Electronic address: jgamble@mun.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antidiabetic therapies for patients with type 2 diabetes are often altered in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION: Patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: 2 reviewers independently screened studies identified through bibliographic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), clinical trial registries, and references from pertinent articles and clinical practice guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials evaluating incretin-based therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes and estimated glomerular filtration rates < 60mL/min/1.73m2. INTERVENTIONS: Incretin-based therapies (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists) compared to placebo or active antidiabetic therapies. OUTCOMES: Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hypoglycemia, mortality, change in fasting plasma glucose, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease. RESULTS: Of 1,619 nonduplicate records screened, 13 studies were included. Compared to placebo, incretin-based therapies significantly reduced HbA1c levels (n = 9; weighted mean difference, -0.64; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.48; I2 = 43%); however, compared with active comparators, they did not (n = 4; weighted mean difference, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.12; I2 = 38%). Incretin-based therapies significantly increased the risk for hypoglycemia compared to placebo (n = 7; relative risk [RR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89; I2 = 0%) but no effect was observed versus active comparators (n = 4; RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03-1.94; I2 = 52%). Limited evidence exists for all-cause mortality (placebo: n = 7 [RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64-2.29; I2 = 0%]; active comparators: n = 3 [RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.32-1.54; I2 = 0%]). LIMITATIONS: Variation among interventions, small number of studies, heterogeneity between studies, and high risk for attrition bias in 7 of the selected studies. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate or severe CKD, incretin-based therapies are effective in reducing HbA1c levels. Hypoglycemic events are rare, and wide CIs for the association preclude any definitive conclusions. Likewise, wide CIs were observed for mortality, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease.
BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antidiabetic therapies for patients with type 2 diabetes are often altered in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION: Patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: 2 reviewers independently screened studies identified through bibliographic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), clinical trial registries, and references from pertinent articles and clinical practice guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials evaluating incretin-based therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes and estimated glomerular filtration rates < 60mL/min/1.73m2. INTERVENTIONS: Incretin-based therapies (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists) compared to placebo or active antidiabetic therapies. OUTCOMES: Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hypoglycemia, mortality, change in fasting plasma glucose, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease. RESULTS: Of 1,619 nonduplicate records screened, 13 studies were included. Compared to placebo, incretin-based therapies significantly reduced HbA1c levels (n = 9; weighted mean difference, -0.64; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.48; I2 = 43%); however, compared with active comparators, they did not (n = 4; weighted mean difference, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.12; I2 = 38%). Incretin-based therapies significantly increased the risk for hypoglycemia compared to placebo (n = 7; relative risk [RR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89; I2 = 0%) but no effect was observed versus active comparators (n = 4; RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03-1.94; I2 = 52%). Limited evidence exists for all-cause mortality (placebo: n = 7 [RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.64-2.29; I2 = 0%]; active comparators: n = 3 [RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.32-1.54; I2 = 0%]). LIMITATIONS: Variation among interventions, small number of studies, heterogeneity between studies, and high risk for attrition bias in 7 of the selected studies. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate or severe CKD, incretin-based therapies are effective in reducing HbA1c levels. Hypoglycemic events are rare, and wide CIs for the association preclude any definitive conclusions. Likewise, wide CIs were observed for mortality, cardiovascular events, and end-stage renal disease.
Authors: Sanaz Kamalinia; Robert G Josse; Patrick J Donio; Lindsay Leduc; Baiju R Shah; Sheldon W Tobe Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Date: 2019-11-13