Literature DB >> 27527803

Stone Retropulsion with Ho: YAG and Tm: YAG Lasers: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Experimental Study.

Wissam Kamal1, Panagiotis Kallidonis1, Georgia Koukiou2, Lefteris Amanatides3, Vasileios Panagopoulos1, Pantelis Ntasiotis1, Evangelos Liatsikos1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the retropulsion of stones with the use of holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho: YAG) laser and thulium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Tm: YAG) laser in settings that could be used in clinical practice.
METHODS: The experimental configuration included a glass tube set in a water bath filled with physiologic saline. Plaster of Paris stones were inserted in the tube. Tm: YAG and Ho: YAG laser systems were used along with a high-speed slow-motion camera. The lasers were activated with different settings. The displacement of the stone was measured according to a custom-made algorithm.
RESULTS: Ho: YAG: the retropulsion of stones was the lowest with the energy setting of 0.5 J and the frequency of 20 Hz with long pulse duration. The highest retropulsion was observed in the case of 3 J, 5 Hz, and short pulse. Tm: YAG: the retropulsion of stones was the lowest with the energy setting of 1 J and the frequency of 10 Hz with either long or short pulse duration. Practically, there was no retropulsion at all. The highest retropulsion was observed in the case of 8 J, 5 Hz, and short pulse.
CONCLUSION: Ho: YAG laser has a linear increase in stone retropulsion with increased pulse energy. On the other hand, the retropulsion rate was kept to the minimum with Tm: YAG as much as the energy level of 8 J. The activation of lasers with short pulse resulted in further displacement of the stone. Lower frequency with the same power setting seemed to result in further stone retropulsion. Higher power with the same frequency setting resulted in further displacement of the stone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Holmium; laser; retropulsion; thulium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27527803     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust?

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-29

3.  Re: Mahajan AD, Mahajan SA. Thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser for stone lithotripsy during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial. Indian J Urol 2022;38:42-7.

Authors:  Gorrepati Rohith; Manoj Kumar Das; Swarnendu Mandal; Prasant Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 4.  Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.

Authors:  Ralf Petzold; Arkadiusz Miernik; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.