Literature DB >> 27527679

Risk factors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A literature review and meta-analysis.

Jop P Verweij1, Pascal N W J Houppermans1, Peter Gooris2, Gertjan Mensink3, J P Richard van Merkesteyn4.   

Abstract

The most common complications that are associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy are: bad splits, postoperative infection, removal of osteosynthesis material, and neurosensory disturbances of the lower lip. Particularly in elective orthognathic surgery, it is important that surgeons inform their patients about the risk of these complications and attempt to minimize these risks. The purpose of this literature review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of these common complications and their risk factors. After a systematic electronic database search, 59 studies were identified and included in this review. For each complication, a pooled mean incidence was computed. Both the pooled study group and the pooled 'complication group' were analysed. The mean incidences for bad split (2.3% per SSO), postoperative infection (9.6% per patient), removal of the osteosynthesis material (11.2% per patient), and neurosensory disturbances of the lower lip (33.9% per patient) are reported. Regularly reported risk factors for complications were the patient's age, smoking habits, presence of third molars, the surgical technique and type of osteosynthesis material. This information may help the surgeon to minimize the risk of these complications and inform the patient about the risks of complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bad split; Infection; Inferior alveolar nerve; Neurosensory; Orthognathic surgery; Osteosynthesis material

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27527679     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Modified spreader for facilitating controlled osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: RAI and JAIN Modification.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Anuj Jain
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-08-24

2.  CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  L Scomparin; M-Q-S Soares; C-M-F Rubira; R-Y-F Yaedú; T-S-N Imada; B-S Centurion; E-S Tolentino; J-R-P Lauris; I-R-F Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Virtual Reality and Three-Dimensional Printed Models Improve the Morphological Understanding in Learning Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Henglei Zhang; Yu He; Ying Chen; Jianfeng Liu; Qi Jin; Shixing Xu; Xi Fu; Jia Qiao; Bing Yu; Feng Niu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Dal Pont vs Hunsuck: Which Technique Can Lead to a Lower Incidence of Bad Split during Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farhad Zeynalzadeh; Zahra Shooshtari; Majid Eshghpour; Seied Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 5.  Titanium or Biodegradable Osteosynthesis in Maxillofacial Surgery? In Vitro and In Vivo Performances.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B Van Bakelen; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke Van Minnen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.