Literature DB >> 27527575

Presence, characteristics and equity of access to breast cancer screening programmes in 27 European countries in 2010 and 2014. Results from an international survey.

S Deandrea1, A Molina-Barceló2, A Uluturk3, J Moreno2, L Neamtiu3, R Peiró-Pérez4, Z Saz-Parkinson3, J Lopez-Alcalde5, D Lerda3, D Salas6.   

Abstract

The European Union Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening suggests the implementation of organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on mammography every other year for women aged 50 to 69years, ensuring equal access to screening, taking into account potential needs for targeting particular socioeconomic groups. A European survey on coverage and participation, and key organisational and policy characteristics of the programmes, targeting years 2010 and 2014, was undertaken in 2014. Overall, 27 countries contributed to this survey, 26 of the 28 European Union member states (92.9%) plus Norway. In 2014, 25 countries reported an ongoing population-based programme, one country reported a pilot programme and another was planning a pilot. In eight countries, the target age range was broader than that proposed by the Council Recommendation, and in three countries the full range was not covered. Fifteen countries reported not reaching some vulnerable populations, such as immigrants, prisoners and people without health insurance, while 22 reported that participation was periodically monitored by socioeconomic variables (e.g. age and territory). Organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on routine mammograms are in place in most EU member states. However, there are still differences in the way screening programmes are implemented, and participation by vulnerable populations should be encouraged.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Europe; Socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27527575     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  20 in total

1.  Breast cancer mortality gaps in Romanian women compared to the EU after 10 years of accession: Is breast cancer screening a priority for action in Romania? (Review of the Statistics).

Authors:  Florentina Furtunescu; Roxana Elena Bohiltea; Silviu Voinea; Tiberiu Augustin Georgescu; Octavian Munteanu; Adrian Neacsu; Corina Silvia Pop
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?

Authors:  Shushiela Appavoo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  An equity analysis of health examination service utilization by women from underdeveloped areas in western China.

Authors:  Yuyan Qian; Jianmin Gao; Zhongliang Zhou; Ju'e Yan; Yongjian Xu; Xiaowei Yang; Yanli Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Experiences and perceptions about undergoing mammographic screening: a qualitative study involving women from a county in Sweden.

Authors:  Maria Norfjord Van Zyl; Sharareh Akhavan; Per Tillgren; Margareta Asp
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018-12

5.  Mastectomized women's perception of breast cancer early detection.

Authors:  Indara Cavalcante Bezerra; Raimunda Magalhães da Silva; Cleoneide Paulo Oliveira; Christina César Praça Brasil; Mardênia Gomes Ferreira Vasconcelos; Marli Vilela Mamede; Marnewton Tadeu Pinheiro de Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Towards equity in organised cancer screening: the case of cervical cancer screening in France.

Authors:  Sylviane Darquy; Grégoire Moutel; Odile Jullian; Stéphanie Barré; Nathalie Duchange
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.

Authors:  Alexander G Mathioudakis; Minna Salakari; Liisa Pylkkanen; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Anke Bramesfeld; Silvia Deandrea; Donata Lerda; Luciana Neamtiu; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Ivan Solà; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  'A double-edged sword': Perceived benefits and harms of active case-finding for people with presumptive tuberculosis and communities-A qualitative study based on expert interviews.

Authors:  Olivia Biermann; Raina Klüppelberg; Knut Lönnroth; Kerri Viney; Maxine Caws; Salla Atkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Feasibility of Classifying Breast Masses Using a Computer-Assisted Diagnosis (CAD) System Based on Ultrasound Elastography and BI-RADS Lexicon.

Authors:  Eduardo F C Fleury; Ana Claudia Gianini; Karem Marcomini; Vilmar Oliveira
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

10.  Predictors and Trend in Attendance for Breast Cancer Screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014.

Authors:  Vilma Kriaucioniene; Janina Petkeviciene
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.