| Literature DB >> 27527493 |
Elisa Albanese1, Mirko Leccese1, Cristiana Di Valentin1, Gianfranco Pacchioni1.
Abstract
N-dopants in bulk monoclinicEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27527493 PMCID: PMC4985629 DOI: 10.1038/srep31435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Local structural features of pure ZrO2 (a1, a2) and the four N-doped ZrO2 structure.
(b1) Nsub3c; (b2) Nsub4c; (c1) Nint3c and (c2) Nint4c. Selected bond lengths (Å) are reported.
Figure 2Total and Projected Densities of States of the N-doped structures.
(a) Nsub3c -ZrO2; (b) Nsub4c -ZrO2; (c) Nint3c -ZrO2 and (d) Nint4c -ZrO2. Grey line represents TDOS, blue N atom, light blue Zr, red and green O3c and O4c, respectively. The insets show the spin density plots (isodensity threshold values 0.007). The Fermi level is set to the highest occupied level (dashed line).
Figure 3Nint3c-ZrO2/Nsub3c-ZrO2 stability phase diagram as a function of O2 partial pressure at 300 K, 700 K and 1000 K in terms of the reaction (2), i.e. NintZrO2 --> NsubZrO2 + 1/2 O2.
The solid line represents ΔG = 0 eV.
Calculated 14N Hyperfine Coupling Constants (mT) and Spin Densities (ρ) for the N-ZrO2 structures.
| A1 | A2 | A3 | aiso | T1 | T2 | T3 | Ρ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nsub3c-ZrO2 | 2.841 | −0.780 | −0.806 | 0.418 | 2.422 | −1.198 | −1.224 | 0.92 |
| Nsub4c-ZrO2 | 2.538 | −0.743 | −0.726 | 0.356 | 2.182 | −1.082 | −1.099 | 0.86 |
| Nint3c-ZrO2 | 3.563 | −0.472 | −0.612 | 0.826 | 2.737 | −1.299 | −1.438 | 0.84 |
| Nint4c-ZrO2 | 3.523 | −0.343 | −0.449 | 0.910 | 2.613 | −1.253 | −1.360 | 0.80 |
Figure 4Scheme of the electron configurations considered.
N-N distance (Å), Mulliken charges and spin densities for each N dopant, relative stabilities (meV) with respect to each model (ΔErel) and the total one (ΔEtot).
| d(N-N) | N1 | N2 | ΔErel | ΔEtot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charge | ρ | Charge | ρ | |||||
| Nsub3c | Nsub3c | |||||||
| 2Nsub3c-ZrO2 | 3.826 | FM | 7.971 | 0.916 | 7.972 | 0.916 | 0 | +417 |
| 3.824 | AFM | 7.971 | 0.918 | 7.971 | −0.918 | +6 | ||
| Nsub4c | Nsub3c | |||||||
| Nsub3c/Nsub4c-ZrO2 | 4.278 | FM | 8.102 | 0.854 | 7.975 | 0.918 | +649 | |
| 4.279 | AFM | 8.102 | 0.849 | 7.975 | −0.918 | +647 | ||
| 4.572 | 3CT | 8.411 | 0.036 | 7.625 | 1.773 | +220 | ||
| 4.402 | 1CT | 8.443 | 7.837 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Nsub4c | Nsub4c | |||||||
| 2Nsub4c-ZrO2 | 4.110 | FM | 8.108 | 0.853 | 8.106 | 0.851 | +544 | |
| 4.030 | 1CT | 8.462 | 7.957 | 0 | +281 | |||
Figure 5Optimized structures of the most stable magnetic configurations for each 2N-ZrO2 model.
(a) 2Nsub3c-ZrO2 FM; (b) Nsub3c/Nsub4c-ZrO2 1CT and (c) 2Nsub4c-ZrO2 1CT.