Ian Foran1, Kenneth Vaz1, Jakub Sikora-Klak1, Samuel R Ward2, Eric R Hentzen1, Sameer B Shah3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. Electronic address: sbshah@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition are effective surgical interventions for cubital tunnel syndrome and yield similarly favorable outcomes. However, a substantial proportion of patients demonstrate unsatisfactory outcomes for reasons that remain unclear. We compared effects of decompression and transposition on regional ulnar nerve strain to better understand the biomechanical impacts of each strategy. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome and scheduled for anterior subcutaneous transposition surgery were enrolled. Simple decompression, circumferential decompression, and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were performed during the course of the transposition procedure. Regional ulnar nerve strain around the elbow was measured for each surgical intervention based on 4 wrist and elbow joint configurations. RESULTS: With elbow extension at 180°, both circumferential decompression and anterior transposition resulted in approximately 68% higher nerve strains than simple decompression. Conversely, with elbow flexion, simple decompression resulted in higher average strains than anterior transposition. Limited regional differences in strain were observed for any surgical intervention with elbow extension. However, with elbow flexion, strains were higher in distal and central regions compared with the proximal region within all surgical groups, and proximal region strain was higher after simple decompression compared with anterior transposition. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by the altered anatomic course, anterior transposition results in lower ulnar nerve strains than simple decompression during elbow flexion and higher nerve strains during elbow extension. Irrespective of anatomic course, circumferential release of paraneurial tissues may also influence nerve strain. Nerve strain varies regionally and is influenced by surgery and joint configuration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our data provide insight into how surgery resolves and redistributes traction on the ulnar nerve. These findings may help inform which surgical procedure to perform for a specific patient, guide rehabilitation protocols, and suggest regions of anatomic concern during index and revision surgery.
PURPOSE: Simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition are effective surgical interventions for cubital tunnel syndrome and yield similarly favorable outcomes. However, a substantial proportion of patients demonstrate unsatisfactory outcomes for reasons that remain unclear. We compared effects of decompression and transposition on regional ulnar nerve strain to better understand the biomechanical impacts of each strategy. METHODS:Patients diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome and scheduled for anterior subcutaneous transposition surgery were enrolled. Simple decompression, circumferential decompression, and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were performed during the course of the transposition procedure. Regional ulnar nerve strain around the elbow was measured for each surgical intervention based on 4 wrist and elbow joint configurations. RESULTS: With elbow extension at 180°, both circumferential decompression and anterior transposition resulted in approximately 68% higher nerve strains than simple decompression. Conversely, with elbow flexion, simple decompression resulted in higher average strains than anterior transposition. Limited regional differences in strain were observed for any surgical intervention with elbow extension. However, with elbow flexion, strains were higher in distal and central regions compared with the proximal region within all surgical groups, and proximal region strain was higher after simple decompression compared with anterior transposition. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by the altered anatomic course, anterior transposition results in lower ulnar nerve strains than simple decompression during elbow flexion and higher nerve strains during elbow extension. Irrespective of anatomic course, circumferential release of paraneurial tissues may also influence nerve strain. Nerve strain varies regionally and is influenced by surgery and joint configuration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our data provide insight into how surgery resolves and redistributes traction on the ulnar nerve. These findings may help inform which surgical procedure to perform for a specific patient, guide rehabilitation protocols, and suggest regions of anatomic concern during index and revision surgery.
Authors: Tobias Rossmann; Ulrike M Heber; Stefan Heber; Lukas F Reissig; Wolfgang Grisold; Wolfgang J Weninger; Stefan Meng Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 3.852