| Literature DB >> 27527211 |
Guangmang Liu1,2, Wei Cao3,4, Tingting Fang5,6, Gang Jia7,8, Hua Zhao9,10, Xiaoling Chen11,12, Caimei Wu13,14, Jing Wang15.
Abstract
Glutamine and N-carbamylglutamate can enhance growth performance and health in animals, but the underlying mechanisms are not yet elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of glutamine and N-carbamylglutamate supplementation in rat metabolism. Thirty rats were fed a control, glutamine, or N-carbamylglutamate diet for four weeks. Urine samples were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics, specifically high-resolution ¹H NMR metabolic profiling combined with multivariate data analysis. Glutamine significantly increased the urine levels of acetamide, acetate, citrulline, creatinine, and methymalonate, and decreased the urine levels of ethanol and formate (p < 0.05). Moreover, N-carbamylglutamate significantly increased the urine levels of creatinine, ethanol, indoxyl sulfate, lactate, methymalonate, acetoacetate, m-hydroxyphenylacetate, and sarcosine, and decreased the urine levels of acetamide, acetate, citrulline, creatine, glycine, hippurate, homogentisate, N-acetylglutamate, phenylacetyglycine, acetone, and p-hydroxyphenylacetate (p < 0.05). Results suggested that glutamine and N-carbamylglutamate could modify urinary metabolome related to nitrogen metabolism and gut microbiota metabolism. Moreover, N-carbamylglutamate could alter energy and lipid metabolism. These findings indicate that different arginine precursors may lead to differences in the biofluid profile in rats.Entities:
Keywords: N-carbamylglutamate; glutamine; metabolism; metabolomics; urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27527211 PMCID: PMC4997391 DOI: 10.3390/nu8080478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Representative 1D 1H NMR spectra urine metabolites obtained from the control, N-carbamylglutamate, and glutamine groups. The region of δ6.2–9.5 was magnified four times compared with the corresponding region of δ0.5–6.2 for the purpose of clarity. Metabolite keys are given in Table 1.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) data of metabolites in rat urine.
| Keys | Metabolites | Moieties | δ 1H (ppm) and Multiplicity | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bile acids | CH3 | 0.64(m), 0.75(m) | U |
| 2 | α-Hydroxy-iso-valerate | δCH3, CH3 | 0.83(d), 0.97(d) | U |
| 3 | α-Hydroxybutyrate | CH3 | 0.89(t) | U |
| 4 | Propionate | CH3 | 1.06(t) | U |
| 5 | Isobutyrate | CH3 | 1.13(d) | U |
| 6 | Ethanol | CH3 | 1.19(t) | U |
| 7 | Methylmalonate | CH3, CH | 1.25(d), 3.75(m) | U |
| 8 | α-Hydroxy-n-valerate | CH3, γCH2 | 0.89(t), 1.31(m) | U |
| 9 | Lactate | αCH, βCH3 | 4.14(q), 1.33(d) | U |
| 10 | Alanine | αCH, βCH3 | 3.77(q), 1.47(d) | U |
| 11 | Citrulline | γCH2, βCH2 | 1.56(m), 1.82(m) | U |
| 12 | Acetate | CH3 | 1.92(s) | U |
| 13 | Acetamide | CH3 | 1.99(s) | U |
| 14 | βCH2, γCH2, CH3 | 2.06(m), 1.87(m), 2.03(s) | U | |
| 15 | Acetone | CH3 | 2.24(s) | U |
| 16 | Acetoacetate | CH3 | 2.28(s) | U |
| 17 | Pyruvate | CH3 | 2.33(s) | U |
| 18 | Succinate | CH2 | 2.40(s) | U |
| 19 | α-Ketoglutarate | βCH2, γCH2 | 2.45(t), 3.01(t) | U |
| 20 | Citrate | CH2 | 2.54(d), 2.68(d) | U |
| 21 | Methylamine | CH3 | 2.61(s) | U |
| 22 | Dimethylamine | CH3 | 2.71(s) | U |
| 23 | Methylguanidine | CH3 | 2.81(s) | U |
| 24 | Trimethylamine | CH3 | 2.88(s) | U |
| 25 | Dimethylglycine | CH3 | 2.93(s) | U |
| 26 | Creatine | CH3, CH2 | 3.04(s), 3.93(s) | U |
| 27 | Creatinine | CH3, CH2 | 3.04(s), 4.05(s) | U |
| 28 | Ornithine | CH2 | 3.06(t) | U |
| 29 | Ethanolamine | CH2 | 3.11(t) | U |
| 30 | Malonate | CH2 | 3.15(s) | U |
| 31 | Choline | OCH2, NCH2, N(CH3)3 | 4.07(t), 3.53(t), 3.21(s) | U |
| 32 | Taurine | –CH2-S, –CH2–NH2 | 3.27(t), 3.43(t) | U |
| 33 | TMAO a | CH3 | 3.27(s) | U |
| 34 | Glycine | CH2 | 3.57(s) | U |
| 35 | Sarcosine | CH2 | 3.6(s) | U |
| 36 | Phenylacetyglycine | 2,6–CH, 3,5–CH, 7–CH, 10–CH | 7.30(t), 7.36(m), 7.42(m), 3.67(s) | U |
| 37 | Hippurate | CH2, 3,5–CH, 4–CH, 2,6–CH | 3.97(d), 7.55(t), 7.63(t), 7.84(d) | U |
| 38 | CH3, 5–CH, 4–CH, 6–CH, CH2 | 4.42(s), 8.21(d), 8.87(d), 8.93(d), 9.24(s) | U | |
| 39 | β-Glucose | 1–CH, 2–CH, 3–CH, 4–CH, 5–CH, 6–CH | 4.47(d), 3.25(dd), 3.49(t), 3.41(dd), 3.46(m), 3.73(dd), 3.90(dd) | U |
| 40 | α-Glucose | 1–CH, 2–CH, 3–CH, 4–CH, 5–CH, 6–CH | 5.24(d), 3.54(dd), 3.71(dd), 3.42(dd), 3.84(m), 3.78(m) | U |
| 41 | Allantoin | CH | 5.39(s) | U |
| 42 | Urea | NH2 | 5.82(s) | U |
| 43 | Homogentisate | 6–CH, 5–CH | 6.67(d), 6.82(d) | U |
| 44 | 6–CH, 2–CH, 3,5–CH | 3.6(s), 6.85(d), 7.15(d) | U | |
| 45 | 6–CH, 4–CH, 3–CH | 6.92(m), 7.04(d), 7.26(t) | U | |
| 46 | Indoxyl sulfate | 4–CH, 5–CH, 6–CH, 7–CH, CH | 7.51(m), 7.22(m), 7.28(m), 7.71(m), 7.37(s) | U |
| 47 | Nicotinate | 2,6–CH, 4–CH, 5–CH | 8.60(d), 8.25(d), 7.5(dd) | U |
| 48 | 4-Aminohippurate | CH2, CH | 7.6(d), 6.8(d), 3.9(d) | U |
| 49 | Benzoate | 2,6–CH, 3,5–CH, 4–CH | 7.87(d), 7.49(dd), 7.56(t) | U |
| 50 | Trigonelline | 2–CH, 4–CH, 6–CH, 5–CH, CH3 | 9.09(s), 8.85(m), 8.81(dd), 8.07(m), 4.44(s) | U |
| 51 | Formate | CH | 8.46(s) | U |
a TMAO, trimethylamine-N-oxide; s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet.
Figure 2(A) PCA (R2X = 0. 545, Q2 = 0.06) and (B) PLS-DA score plots (R2X = 0.192, R2Y = 0.795, Q2 = 0.474) based on the 1H NMR spectra of the urine obtained from urinary metabolites from the control (black squares), glutamine (green triangles), and N-carbamylglutamate (red circles) groups.
Figure 3OPLS-DA score plots of urinary metabolites derived from the control (black squares), glutamine (green triangles), and N-carbamylglutamate (red circles) ((A), R2X = 0.202, Q2 = 0.486; (B), R2X = 0.307, Q2 = 0.773; (C), R2X = 0.292, Q2 = 0.780) groups.
Orthogonal projection to latent structure-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) coefficients derived from the NMR data of urine metabolites obtained from the (A) control, (B) glutamine, and (C) N-carbamylglutamate groups.
| Metabolite | B (vs. A) a | C (vs. A) a | B (vs. C) a |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetamide (13) | 0.608 | −0.728 | 0.906 |
| Acetate (12) | 0.713 | −0.742 | 0.768 |
| Citrulline (11) | 0.758 | −0.962 | 0.966 |
| Creatine (26) | — | −0.790 | 0.783 |
| Creatinine (27) | 0.723 | 0.717 | — |
| Ethanol (6) | −0.630 | 0.692 | −0.631 |
| Formate (51) | −0.621 | — | — |
| Glycine (34) | — | −0.616 | — |
| Hippurate (37) | — | −0.914 | 0.906 |
| Homogentisate (43) | — | −0.810 | 0.834 |
| Indoxyl sulfate (46) | — | 0.786 | −0.786 |
| Lactate (9) | — | 0.653 | — |
| Methylmalonate (7) | 0.738 | 0.608 | −0.653 |
| — | −0.967 | 0.978 | |
| Phenylacetyglycine (36) | — | −0.634 | — |
| α-Hydroxy-n-valerate (8) | −0.684 | — | — |
| α-Ketoglutarate (19) | — | — | −0.623 |
| Acetoacetate (16) | — | 0.786 | −0.815 |
| Acetone (15) | — | −0.912 | 0.944 |
| — | 0.815 | −0.883 | |
| — | −0.813 | 0.844 | |
| Sarcosine (35) | — | 0.865 | −0.853 |
| α-Hydroxy-iso-valerate (2) | — | 0.607 | — |
| Pyruvate (4) | — | — | −0.608 |
| Methylamine (21) | — | — | −0.635 |
a Correlation coefficients: positive and negative signs indicate positive and negative correlations in the concentrations, respectively. The correlation coefficient of |r|> 0.602 was used as the cutoff value. ‘‘—’’ means the correlation coefficient |r| is less than 0.602. Analysis of relative integral from metabolites was given in Table S1 (Supplementary Material).
Figure 4N-carbamylglutamate-induced changes in the metabolic pathway, upregulated, downegulated; PC, phosphorylcholine; NAGS, N-acetylglutamate; CPS-1, carbamoylphosphate synthetase-1; ASS, argininosuccinate synthase; ASL, argininosuccinate lyase; OCT, ornithine carbamonyltransferase.