Literature DB >> 27525707

Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the Manchester Programme.

Richard Thomas Ramsden1, Simon Richard Mackenzie Freeman, Simon Kingsley Wickham Lloyd, Andrew Thomas King, Xin Shi, Charlotte Lucy Ward, Susan Mary Huson, Deborah Jane Mawman, Martin Paul O'Driscoll, Dafydd Gareth Evans, Scott Alexander Rutherford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Implanted with a Cochlear ABI22 or ABI24M between 1994 and 2009 because of NF2 disease. INTERVENTION(S): Rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surgical complication rate; audiological outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 50 primary ABI insertions in 49 patients, including 16 inserted at the time of first side tumor removal as a sleeper, and two revision repositionings which failed to improve outcome. Postoperatively three patients had cerebrospinal fluid leaks which did not require reoperation, one patient had meningitis, and eleven patients suffered either temporary or permanent lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Twenty-nine patients became full time users; a further 12 patients became non-users. Three patients died while their device was inactive. Five patients retain serviceable contralateral hearing. Audiological open set testing of users showed means of: environmental sounds discrimination 51%; phoneme discrimination: with ABI alone 22%/lip reading (LR) 45%/ABI with LR 65%; sentence testing: with ABI alone 13%/LR 19%/ABI with LR 54%.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with NF2 implanted with an ABI find the device a useful aid to communication in conjunction with LR and in recognizing common environmental sounds. A small proportion gain open set discrimination. Almost a third of patients may end up as non-users. There is probably an increased risk of postoperative lower cranial nerve dysfunction so careful preoperative assessment is advised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27525707     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem stimulation with a conformable microfabricated array elicits responses with tonotopically organized components.

Authors:  Amélie A Guex; Ariel Edward Hight; Shreya Narasimhan; Nicolas Vachicouras; Daniel J Lee; Stéphanie P Lacour; M Christian Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Kunal R Shetty; Sarah E Ridge; Vivek Kanumuri; Angela Zhu; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 4.  Role of Oscillations in Auditory Temporal Processing: A General Model for Temporal Processing of Sensory Information in the Brain?

Authors:  Andreas Bahmer; Daya Shankar Gupta
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Auditory Brainstem Implantation for Adults With Neurofibromatosis 2 or Severe Inner Ear Abnormalities: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

6.  Human Cochlear Nucleus on 7 Tesla Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Insights Into Micro-anatomy and Function for Auditory Brainstem Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Lorenz Epprecht; Ahad Qureshi; Elliott D Kozin; Nicolas Vachicouras; Alexander M Huber; Ron Kikinis; Nikos Makris; M Christian Brown; Katherine L Reinshagen; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.619

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.