Literature DB >> 27525691

A comment about the quantitative analysis of normal vaginal shape and dimension.

Ângelo do Carmo Silva Matthes1,2, Gustavo Zucca Matthes3,4,5.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27525691     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-016-3094-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Histopathologic findings on uterosacral ligaments in women with chronic pelvic pain and visually normal pelvis at laparoscopy.

Authors:  Patricia C Nascu; George A Vilos; Hellen C Ettler; Basim Abu-Rafea; Jackie Hollet-Caines; Riad Ahmad
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 2.  Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men.

Authors:  David Veale; Sarah Miles; Sally Bramley; Gordon Muir; John Hodsoll
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Quantitative analyses of variability in normal vaginal shape and dimension on MR images.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Cornelia Betschart; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Author's reply to letter from Matthes and Zucca-Matthes on "Quantitative analyses of variability in normal vaginal shape and dimension on MR images".

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Cornelia Betschart; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.894
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.