| Literature DB >> 27525087 |
Omar A Meelu1, Usman Baber1, Kleanthis Theodoropoulos1, Marco G Mennuni1, Annapoorna S Kini1, Samin K Sharma1.
Abstract
Possible links between inflammatory stimuli and atherothrombotic disease in the context of gallbladder pathology are not well understood. Our case demonstrates that clinical suspicion of cardiac disease after a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis should remain high in light of the dire consequences of a missed diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; cardiac catheterization; inflammation; myocardial infarction
Year: 2016 PMID: 27525087 PMCID: PMC4974431 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Case Rep ISSN: 2050-0904
Figure 1Electrocardiogram (ECG) taken at baseline, upon hospital admission.
Figure 2Electrocardiogram (ECG) taken prior to planned cholecystectomy.
Figure 3Coronary angiogram displaying the location of the high‐grade culprit lesion in the right coronary artery (RCA).
Figure 4Coronary angiogram of the left main, the bifurcation of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and its first diagonal branch (D1), and total occlusion of the left circumflex (LCx) artery.
Figure 5Electrocardiogram (ECG) taken post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
White Blood Cell differential counts of subject throughout hospital admission
| Cell population | Upon admission | Preoperative | Discharge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leukocyte | 19.3 × 10/L (reference range: 5–10 × 10/L) | 13.9 × 10/L | 8.0 × 10/L |
| Lymphocyte | 64.8% (reference range: 20–40%) | 46.2% | 31.9% |
| Neutrophil | 85.1% (reference range: 50–70%) | 74.3% | 61.8% |
| Basophil | 2.7% (reference range: 0–1%) | 2.1% | 0.8% |
| Eosinophil | 4.5% (reference range: 0–3%) | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| Monocyte | 20.2% (reference range: 2–6%) | 17.9% | 11.6% |