| Literature DB >> 27525034 |
Shan Liu1, Aiqiao Li2, Xiaomei Feng3, Xueliang Zhang4, Kai Wang4.
Abstract
We establish a dynamical model for tuberculosis of humans and cows. For the model, we firstly give the basic reproduction number R 0. Furthermore, we discuss the dynamical behaviors of the model. By epidemiological investigation of tuberculosis among humans and livestock from 2007 to 2014 in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, we estimate the parameters of the model and study the transmission trend of the disease in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. The reproduction number in Urumqi for the model is estimated to be 0.1811 (95% confidence interval: 0.123-0.281). Finally, we perform some sensitivity analysis of several model parameters and give some useful comments on controlling the transmission of tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27525034 PMCID: PMC4976259 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3410320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
The cow TB quarantine statistics in 2007–2014.
| Time | Cow herds (head) | TB quarantine (head) | Positive (head) | Positive rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 21232 | 10084 | 28 | 0.28% |
| 2008 | 20789 | 15359 | 97 | 0.63% |
| 2009 | 24527 | 12099 | 39 | 0.32% |
| 2010 | 20789 | 9543 | 35 | 0.37% |
| 2011 | 15066 | 10304 | 99 | 0.96% |
| 2012 | 13211 | 9071 | 15 | 0.17% |
| 2013 | 9429 | 9830 | 14 | 0.14% |
| 2014 | 14638 | 5981 | 6 | 0.10% |
|
| ||||
| Total | 139681 | 82271 | 333 | 0.40% |
The cow TB quarantine statistics of scale cow field in 2007–2014.
| Time | TB quarantine (head) | Positive (head) | Positive rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 6955 | 26 | 0.37% |
| 2008 | 6732 | 43 | 0.64% |
| 2009 | 4865 | 27 | 0.55% |
| 2010 | 2155 | 11 | 0.52% |
| 2011 | 3926 | 61 | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 4263 | 4 | 0.09% |
| 2013 | 3418 | 5 | 0.15% |
| 2014 | 3360 | 6 | 0.18% |
|
| |||
| Total | 35634 | 183 | 0.51% |
The cow TB quarantine statistics of grazed cows in 2007–2014.
| Time | TB quarantine (head) | Positive (head) | Positive rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3129 | 2 | 0.06% |
| 2008 | 8627 | 54 | 0.63% |
| 2009 | 7234 | 12 | 0.17% |
| 2010 | 7428 | 24 | 0.32% |
| 2011 | 6378 | 38 | 0.60% |
| 2012 | 4808 | 11 | 0.23% |
| 2013 | 6412 | 9 | 0.14% |
| 2014 | 2621 | 0 | 0% |
|
| |||
| Total | 46637 | 150 | 0.32% |
The point estimate and interval estimation of TB positive cows in Urumqi city in 2007–2014.
| Time | Cow herds (head) | Positive rate (%) | Point estimate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 21232 | 0.28% | 59 | [37,81] |
| 2008 | 20789 | 0.63% | 131 | [105,157] |
| 2009 | 24527 | 0.32% | 79 | [54,104] |
| 2010 | 20789 | 0.37% | 76 | [51,101] |
| 2011 | 15066 | 0.96% | 145 | [116,173] |
| 2012 | 13211 | 0.17% | 22 | [11,33] |
| 2013 | 9429 | 0.14% | 13 | [6,20] |
| 2014 | 14638 | 0.10% | 15 | [3,26] |
Figure 1Transmission diagram of TB among humans and cows.
Descriptions and values of parameters in model.
| Parameter | Value | Interpretation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3853.8 | Recruiting of susceptible cows | [ |
|
| 1/5 | Natural death rate of cows | Estimation |
| β1 | 1.0995 × 10−5 | The rate of cows infected TB via cows | Fitting |
| β2 | 5.7803 × 10−5 | The rate of cows infected TB via humans | Fitting |
| α | 0 | Mortality rate due to TB of cows | Estimation |
| μ | 0.85 | The slaughter rate to infected cows | Estimation |
| δ | 0.12 | The isolation rate to infected cows | Estimation |
|
| 36 | Recruiting of susceptible humans | [ |
|
| 0.04 | The removal rate of livestock worker in dairy farm | [ |
| β3 | 1.6252 × 10−5 | The rate of humans infected TB via cows | Fitting |
| β4 | 0 | The rate of humans infected TB via humans | Estimation |
| ρ | 1/3 | Progression rate to TB | [ |
| α | 0.139 | Mortality rate due to TB of humans | [ |
| γ | 0.058 | Cure rate to TB | [ |
| σ | 0.01 | Rate of relapse to active TB | [ |
The point estimation and 95% Bootstrap confidence interval for the parameters and R 0.
| Parameter | Point estimate | 95% Bootstrap CI |
|---|---|---|
| β1 | 1.0995 × 10−5 | [7.49 × 10−6, 1.71 × 10−5] |
| β2 | 5.7803 × 10−5 | [2.72 × 10−5, 9.53 × 10−5] |
| β3 | 1.6252 × 10−5 | [1.76 × 10−19, 4.45 × 10−18] |
|
| 0.1811 | [0.123,0.281] |
Figure 2The frequency histogram for R 0.
Figure 3The cow TB positive fitting model in 2007–2014.
Figure 4The cow TB positive fitting model for Bootstrap in 2007–2014.
Figure 5The tendency of the number of cow positive TB cases.
Partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCCs) for aggregate R 0 and each input parameter.
| Input parameter | PRCC |
|
|---|---|---|
|
| −0.5549 | 0 |
| α | −0.7175 | 0 |
| μ | −0.9008 | 0 |
| δ | −0.7349 | 0 |
| ρ | 0.0223 | 0.3210 |
| γ | −0.0187 | 0.4046 |
| σ | 0.0270 | 0.2293 |
| β1 | 0.5341 | 0 |
| β2 | −0.0177 | 0.4292 |
| β3 | 0.5001 | 0 |
Figure 6Partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCCs) result for the dependence of R 0 on each parameter.
Figure 7The influence of parameters μ and δ on the number of cow positive TB cases.