Background: Optimal nutritional choices are linked with better health, but many current interventions to improve diet have limited effect. We tested the hypothesis that providing personalized nutrition (PN) advice based on information on individual diet and lifestyle, phenotype and/or genotype would promote larger, more appropriate, and sustained changes in dietary behaviour. Methods: : Adults from seven European countries were recruited to an internet-delivered intervention (Food4Me) and randomized to: (i) conventional dietary advice (control) or to PN advice based on: (ii) individual baseline diet; (iii) individual baseline diet plus phenotype (anthropometry and blood biomarkers); or (iv) individual baseline diet plus phenotype plus genotype (five diet-responsive genetic variants). Outcomes were dietary intake, anthropometry and blood biomarkers measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months' intervention. Results: At baseline, mean age of participants was 39.8 years (range 18-79), 59% of participants were female and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.5 kg/m 2 . From the enrolled participants, 1269 completed the study. Following a 6-month intervention, participants randomized to PN consumed less red meat [-5.48 g, (95% confidence interval:-10.8,-0.09), P = 0.046], salt [-0.65 g, (-1.1,-0.25), P = 0.002] and saturated fat [-1.14 % of energy, (-1.6,-0.67), P < 0.0001], increased folate [29.6 µg, (0.21,59.0), P = 0.048] intake and had higher Healthy Eating Index scores [1.27, (0.30, 2.25), P = 0.010) than those randomized to the control arm. There was no evidence that including phenotypic and phenotypic plus genotypic information enhanced the effectiveness of the PN advice. Conclusions: Among European adults, PN advice via internet-delivered intervention produced larger and more appropriate changes in dietary behaviour than a conventional approach.
Background: Optimal nutritional choices are linked with better health, but many current interventions to improve diet have limited effect. We tested the hypothesis that providing personalized nutrition (PN) advice based on information on individual diet and lifestyle, phenotype and/or genotype would promote larger, more appropriate, and sustained changes in dietary behaviour. Methods: : Adults from seven European countries were recruited to an internet-delivered intervention (Food4Me) and randomized to: (i) conventional dietary advice (control) or to PN advice based on: (ii) individual baseline diet; (iii) individual baseline diet plus phenotype (anthropometry and blood biomarkers); or (iv) individual baseline diet plus phenotype plus genotype (five diet-responsive genetic variants). Outcomes were dietary intake, anthropometry and blood biomarkers measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months' intervention. Results: At baseline, mean age of participants was 39.8 years (range 18-79), 59% of participants were female and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.5 kg/m 2 . From the enrolled participants, 1269 completed the study. Following a 6-month intervention, participants randomized to PN consumed less red meat [-5.48 g, (95% confidence interval:-10.8,-0.09), P = 0.046], salt [-0.65 g, (-1.1,-0.25), P = 0.002] and saturated fat [-1.14 % of energy, (-1.6,-0.67), P < 0.0001], increased folate [29.6 µg, (0.21,59.0), P = 0.048] intake and had higher Healthy Eating Index scores [1.27, (0.30, 2.25), P = 0.010) than those randomized to the control arm. There was no evidence that including phenotypic and phenotypic plus genotypic information enhanced the effectiveness of the PN advice. Conclusions: Among European adults, PN advice via internet-delivered intervention produced larger and more appropriate changes in dietary behaviour than a conventional approach.
Authors: C A Celis-Morales; D M Lyall; S R Gray; L Steell; J Anderson; S Iliodromiti; P Welsh; Y Guo; F Petermann; D F Mackay; M E S Bailey; J P Pell; J M R Gill; N Sattar Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Charles Senteio; Julia Adler-Milstein; Caroline Richardson; Tiffany Veinot Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; José María Ordovas; José Alfredo Martínez Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Rachael Jinnette; Ai Narita; Byron Manning; Sarah A McNaughton; John C Mathers; Katherine M Livingstone Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Katherine M Livingstone; Carlos Celis-Morales; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Hannah Forster; Clara Woolhead; Clare B O'Donovan; George Moschonis; Yannis Manios; Iwona Traczyk; Thomas E Gundersen; Christian A Drevon; Cyril F M Marsaux; Rosalind Fallaize; Anna L Macready; Hannelore Daniel; Wim H M Saris; Julie A Lovegrove; Mike Gibney; Eileen R Gibney; Marianne Walsh; Lorraine Brennan; J Alfredo Martinez; John C Mathers Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Iris M de Hoogh; Barbara L Winters; Kristin M Nieman; Sabina Bijlsma; Tanja Krone; Tim J van den Broek; Barbara D Anderson; Martien P M Caspers; Joshua C Anthony; Suzan Wopereis Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 5.717