Literature DB >> 27524674

Neural correlates of restrained eaters' high susceptibility to food cues: An fMRI study.

Yu Wang1, Debo Dong2, Jackson Todd3, Jie Du4, Zhou Yang3, Hui Lu5, Hong Chen6.   

Abstract

Many studies have reported that specific susceptibility to food cues plays an important role in disordered eating behavior. However, whether restraint status modulates the neural bases of attentional bias to different types of food cues remains unknown. Thus, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted in individuals (12 restraint eaters, 12 unrestraint eaters) exposed to high/low-energy food and neutral images while performing a two-choice oddball task. The results indicated that restrained eaters responded more quickly to high-energy food images than to neutral and low-energy food images. More notably, compared with unrestrained eaters, restrained eaters showed faster reaction times, hyper-activation in a much wider array of reward (e.g., insula/orbitofrontal cortex), attention (superior frontal gyrus) and visual processing (e.g., superior temporal gyrus) regions, and hypo-activation in cognitive control areas (e.g., anterior cingulate) in response to high-energy food cues. Furthermore, among restrained eaters, the longest reaction times were found for low-energy food images, and activation of the attention and visual-related cortex (e.g., superior parietal gyrus) in the low-neutral contrast condition was significantly stronger than in unrestrained eaters. These findings contribute to our understanding of susceptibility to food cues: in addition to the special sensitivity (attentional bias) to high-energy food images, restrained eaters may also be more sensitive (allocate more attentional resources) to low-energy food images. These potential neural bases of restrained eaters may help clarify why dieting to lose or maintain weight is so often unsuccessful.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional bias; Food cues; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Restrained eating; Susceptibility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524674     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  Pre-operative Restraint and Post-operative Hunger, Disinhibition and Emotional Eating Predict Weight Loss at 2 Years Post-laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.

Authors:  Annemarie Hindle; Xochitl De la Piedad Garcia; Melissa Hayden; Paul E O'Brien; Leah Brennan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Got chocolate? Bilateral prefrontal cortex stimulation augments chocolate consumption.

Authors:  Chan To; Mary Falcone; James Loughead; Erin Logue-Chamberlain; Roy Hamilton; Joseph Kable; Caryn Lerman; Rebecca L Ashare
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Neural processing of food and emotional stimuli in adolescent and adult anorexia nervosa patients.

Authors:  Stefanie Horndasch; Julie Roesch; Clemens Forster; Arnd Dörfler; Silja Lindsiepe; Hartmut Heinrich; Holmer Graap; Gunther H Moll; Oliver Kratz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neural responsiveness to Chinese versus Western food images: An functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Chinese young adults.

Authors:  Xi Xu; Jiajia Pu; Amy Shaw; Todd Jackson
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-08-12

5.  A neurobehavioral study on the efficacy of price interventions in promoting healthy food choices among low socioeconomic families.

Authors:  Tannista Banerjee; Veena Chattaraman; Hao Zou; Gopikrishna Deshpande
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Brain Responses to High-Calorie Visual Food Cues in Individuals with Normal-Weight or Obesity: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yingkai Yang; Qian Wu; Filip Morys
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.