F Iturri-Clavero1, L Galbarriatu-Gutierrez2, A Gonzalez-Uriarte1, G Tamayo-Medel1, K de Orte1, A Martinez-Ruiz1, K Castellon-Larios3, S D Bergese4. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkai, Spain. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkai, Spain. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: Karina.CastellonLarios@osumc.edu. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To describe the adaptation of Cruces University Hospital to the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI), and how the acquisition and use of this technology would impact the day-to-day running of the neurosurgical suite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the ethics committee, an observational, prospective study was performed from June 2012 to April 2014, which included 109 neurosurgical procedures with the assistance of ioMRI. These were performed using the Polestar N-30 system (PSN30; Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO), which was integrated into the operating room. RESULTS: A total of 159 procedures were included: 109 cranial surgeries assisted with ioMRI and 50 control cases (no ioMRI use). There were no statistical significant differences when anaesthetic time (p=0.587) and surgical time (p=0.792) were compared; however, an important difference was shown in duration of patient positioning (p<0.0009) and total duration of the procedure (p<0.0009) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ioMRI is necessary for most neurosurgical suites; however, a few things need to be taken into consideration when adapting to it. Increase procedure time, the use of specific MRI-safe devices, as well as a checklist for each patient to minimise risks, should be taken into consideration. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
AIM: To describe the adaptation of Cruces University Hospital to the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI), and how the acquisition and use of this technology would impact the day-to-day running of the neurosurgical suite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the ethics committee, an observational, prospective study was performed from June 2012 to April 2014, which included 109 neurosurgical procedures with the assistance of ioMRI. These were performed using the Polestar N-30 system (PSN30; Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO), which was integrated into the operating room. RESULTS: A total of 159 procedures were included: 109 cranial surgeries assisted with ioMRI and 50 control cases (no ioMRI use). There were no statistical significant differences when anaesthetic time (p=0.587) and surgical time (p=0.792) were compared; however, an important difference was shown in duration of patient positioning (p<0.0009) and total duration of the procedure (p<0.0009) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ioMRI is necessary for most neurosurgical suites; however, a few things need to be taken into consideration when adapting to it. Increase procedure time, the use of specific MRI-safe devices, as well as a checklist for each patient to minimise risks, should be taken into consideration. Published by Elsevier Ltd.