Literature DB >> 27524506

Usefulness of biological variation in the establishment of delta check limits.

Jehoon Lee1, Soo-Young Kim1, Hi Jeong Kwon1, Hae Kyung Lee1, Yonggoo Kim1, Yeongsic Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological variation is used in the calculation of reference change values (RCVs) for a delta check. In this study, we examined the correlation between intra-individual biological coefficients of variation (CVI) and delta check limits according to population distribution.
METHODS: A total of 1,533,359 paired test results of nine routine chemistry tests were used to make the population distributions of delta percent changes. Their 0.5th, 2.5th, 97.5th, and 99.5th percentiles were then used for delta check limits.
RESULTS: A large difference was observed between the chemistry tests in the percentage exceeding the delta check limits according to the RCVs. The mean percentage of test results of each test item exceeding the delta check limits of RCV95% ranged from 12.3% to 40.6%. Delta percent changes of protein, albumin, sodium (Na), potassium (K) and chloride (Cl) showed a symmetric distribution. However, an asymmetric distribution was observed in the delta percent changes of glucose, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine. A good correlation was observed between CVI and the delta check limits according to population distribution and a closer correlation was observed when using the test items with CVI of <5.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-individual biological coefficients of variation (CVI) would be useful for the establishment of delta check limits. Copyright Â
© 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological variation; Delta check; Delta check limit; Population distribution; Reference change values

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524506     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  3 in total

1.  Clinical Application of Overlapping Confidence Intervals for Monitoring Changes in Serial Clinical Chemistry Test Results.

Authors:  Jooyoung Cho; Dong Min Seo; Young Uh
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Combined strategy of knowledge-based rule selection and historical data percentile-based range determination to improve an autoverification system for clinical chemistry test results.

Authors:  Jing Zhu; Hao Wang; Beili Wang; Xiaoke Hao; Wei Cui; Yong Duan; Yi Zhang; Liang Ming; Yingchun Zhou; Haitao Ding; Hongling Ou; Weiwei Lin; Liu Lu; Yuanjiang Shang; Yong Yang; Xianming Liang; Jiangtao Ma; Wenhua Sun; Te Chen; Guang Han; Meng Han; Weiting Yu; Baishen Pan; Wei Guo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Strategy for 90% autoverification of clinical chemistry and immunoassay test results using six sigma process improvement.

Authors:  Edward W Randell; Garry Short; Natasha Lee; Allison Beresford; Margaret Spencer; Marina Kennell; Zoë Moores; David Parry
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-05-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.