| Literature DB >> 27524388 |
Pavel Markov1, Sohei Satoi2, Masanori Kon3.
Abstract
Most cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lethal. Margin-negative surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment and the only chance of a cure. Differences in pathological reporting, surgical technique, definitions of resection margin, and group stratification all affect outcome analyses. Furthermore, there are controversial issues influencing the clinical interpretation of resection margin after pancreatectomy. There is no standardized definition of margin involvement in resected specimens of PDAC. The non-standardized pathologic approach explains the wide range of positive resection margin rates (13-71%) that have previously been reported. A standardized pathologic evaluation needs to be developed for proper assessment of resection margin after oncologic pancreatectomy. This manuscript reviews the current controversial issues in assessing resection margin in order to enhance understanding of the current status and potential role of pathological evaluation in patients with PDAC.Entities:
Keywords: 1 mm-rule; Inking method; Margin-negative resection; Pathological examination
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27524388 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ISSN: 1868-6974 Impact factor: 7.027