Literature DB >> 27524369

Schizophrenia on YouTube.

Matthew M Nour1, Murraih H Nour1, Olga-Maria Tsatalou1, Alvaro Barrera1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: YouTube ( www.youtube.com ) is the most popular video-sharing Web site on the Internet and is used by medical students as a source of information regarding mental health conditions, including schizophrenia. The accuracy and educational utility of schizophrenia presentations on YouTube are unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of depictions of psychosis in the context of a diagnosis of schizophrenia (referred to in this article as "acute schizophrenia") on YouTube and to assess the utility of these videos as educational tools for teaching medical students to recognize the clinical features of acute schizophrenia.
METHODS: YouTube was searched for videos purporting to show acute schizophrenia. Eligible videos were independently rated by two consultant psychiatrists on two separate occasions 22 days apart for diagnostic accuracy, psychopathology, and educational utility.
RESULTS: Videos (N=4,200) were assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority were not eligible for further analysis, mostly because they did not claim to show a patient with schizophrenia (74%) or contained duplicated content (11%). Of 35 videos that met the eligibility and adequacy criteria, only 12 accurately depicted acute schizophrenia. Accurate videos were characterized by persecutory delusions (83%), inappropriate affect (75%), and negative symptoms (83%). Despite the fact that 83% of accurate videos were deemed to have good educational utility compared with 15% of inaccurate videos, accurate and inaccurate videos had similar view counts (290,048 versus 186,124).
CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenia presentations on YouTube offer a distorted picture of the condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Media; Medical student education; Public attitudes about the mentally ill; Schizophrenia; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524369     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  9 in total

1.  YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

Authors:  Kimberly Haslam; Heather Doucette; Shauna Hachey; Teanne MacCallum; Denise Zwicker; Martha Smith-Brilliant; Robert Gilbert
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2019-02-01

2.  Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.

Authors:  Wael Osman; Fatma Mohamed; Mohamed Elhassan; Abdulhadi Shoufan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Qualitative analysis of Parkinson's disease information on social media: the case of YouTube™.

Authors:  Ibrahim Saleh Al-Busaidi; Tim J Anderson; Yassar Alamri
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.543

4.  Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Intragastric Balloon Videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Akin Calisir; Ilhan Ece
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Self-Management of Severe Mental Health Problems: Qualitative Study of Staff Views.

Authors:  Natalie Berry; Sandra Bucci; Fiona Lobban
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-11-01

6.  Xigua Video as a Source of Information on Breast Cancer: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Pan; Changhua Yu; Tao Li; Xilei Zhou; Tingting Dai; Hanhan Tian; Yaozu Xiong
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Guner Cakmak; Baris Mantoglu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-24

8.  Is social media reliable as a source of information on Peyronie's disease treatment?

Authors:  Numan Baydilli; Ismail Selvi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiangqing Huang; Shengcen Zhang; Qirong Xiao; Yingping Cao; Bin Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.