Literature DB >> 27523654

Quality of wound dressings: a first step in establishing shared criteria and objective procedures to evaluate their performance.

N Mennini1, A Greco2, A Bellingeri3, F De Vita4, F Petrella4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are no well-defined criteria for assessing the efficacy and quality of wound dressings, and evaluation is often simplistic and based on the subjective opinion of the health-care professional. The aim of this study was to identify specific parameters suitable for measuring dressings' performance, and to recommend laboratory tests able to evaluate these specific criteria in an objective manner.
METHOD: After reviewing all tests currently used in Italy and examining the criteria for evaluating the quality of dressings, the authors selected 12 clinically significant parameters. These parameters were measured using standard and non-standard tests, and in some cases, these tests were modified and improved to simulate real-life conditions more accurately.
RESULTS: Most of the tests used were able to discriminate well between dressings belonging to different brands, with some tests being more suitable than others for the assessment of specific dressings.
CONCLUSION: These results highlighted some issues in the standard testing procedures, such as the need of a suitable fluid that mimics the real exudate, and the importance of standard temperature and humidity conditions during testing. Our study paves the way for a larger project aimed at a systematic evaluation of dressing quality able to assess every wound dressing on the market.

Keywords:  in vitro; performance; test model; wound dressing; wound exudate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27523654     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  6 in total

1.  The sorptivity and durability of gelling fibre dressings tested in a simulated sacral pressure ulcer system.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Paulo Alves; Evan Call; Nick Santamaria; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  The performance of gelling fibre wound dressings under clinically relevant robotic laboratory tests.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings.

Authors:  Kristo Nuutila; Elof Eriksson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Therapy of infected wounds: overcoming clinical challenges by advanced drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Pia Kaiser; Jana Wächter; Maike Windbergs
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  In Vitro Wound Dressing Stack Model as a First Step to Evaluate the Behavior of Dressing Materials in Wound Bed-An Assessment of Mass Transport Phenomena in Hydrogel Wound Dressings.

Authors:  Ewelina Baran; Anna Górska; Artur Birczyński; Wiktor Hudy; Wojciech Kulinowski; Witold Jamróz; Władysław P Węglarz; Piotr Kulinowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Fluid management and strength postsimulated use of primary and secondary dressings for treating diabetic foot ulcers: Robotic phantom studies.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.