Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam1, Maiko Inoue2, Seungjun Ahn3, Jesse McCann4, Elona Dhrami-Gavazi4, Lawrence A Yannuzzi2, K Bailey Freund4. 1. LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York; Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: balaratnasingam@gmail.com. 2. LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York; Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. 4. LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York; Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is correlated with visual acuity (VA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five eyes of 66 subjects with DR (65 eyes), branch retinal vein occlusion (19 eyes), and central retinal vein occlusion (11 eyes). METHODS: Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) and OCT angiography (OCTA; Avanti, Optovue RTVue XR) data from a single visit were analyzed. FAZ area, point thickness of central fovea, central 1-mm subfield thickness, the occurrence of intraretinal cysts, ellipsoid zone disruption, and disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) length were measured. VA was also recorded. Correlations between FAZ area and VA were explored using regression models. Main outcome measure was VA. RESULTS: Mean age was 62.9±13.2 years. There was no difference in demographic and OCT-derived anatomic measurements between branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion groups (all P ≥ 0.058); therefore, data from the 2 groups were pooled together to a single RVO group for further statistical comparisons. Univariate and multiple regression analysis showed that the area of the FAZ was significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO (all P ≤ 0.003). The relationship between FAZ area and VA varied with age (P = 0.026) such that for a constant FAZ area, an increase in patient age was associated with poorer vision (rise in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity). Disruption of the ellipsoid zone was significantly correlated with VA in univariate and multiple regression analysis (both P < 0.001). Occurrence of intraretinal cysts, DRIL length, and lens status were significantly correlated with VA in the univariate regression analysis (P ≤ 0.018) but not the multiple regression analysis (P ≥ 0.210). Remaining variables evaluated in this study were not predictive of VA (all P ≥ 0.225). CONCLUSIONS: The area of the FAZ is significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO and this relationship is modulated by patient age. Further study about FAZ area and VA correlations during the natural course of retinal vascular diseases and following treatment is warranted.
PURPOSE: To determine if the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is correlated with visual acuity (VA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five eyes of 66 subjects with DR (65 eyes), branch retinal vein occlusion (19 eyes), and central retinal vein occlusion (11 eyes). METHODS: Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) and OCT angiography (OCTA; Avanti, Optovue RTVue XR) data from a single visit were analyzed. FAZ area, point thickness of central fovea, central 1-mm subfield thickness, the occurrence of intraretinal cysts, ellipsoid zone disruption, and disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) length were measured. VA was also recorded. Correlations between FAZ area and VA were explored using regression models. Main outcome measure was VA. RESULTS: Mean age was 62.9±13.2 years. There was no difference in demographic and OCT-derived anatomic measurements between branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion groups (all P ≥ 0.058); therefore, data from the 2 groups were pooled together to a single RVO group for further statistical comparisons. Univariate and multiple regression analysis showed that the area of the FAZ was significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO (all P ≤ 0.003). The relationship between FAZ area and VA varied with age (P = 0.026) such that for a constant FAZ area, an increase in patient age was associated with poorer vision (rise in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity). Disruption of the ellipsoid zone was significantly correlated with VA in univariate and multiple regression analysis (both P < 0.001). Occurrence of intraretinal cysts, DRIL length, and lens status were significantly correlated with VA in the univariate regression analysis (P ≤ 0.018) but not the multiple regression analysis (P ≥ 0.210). Remaining variables evaluated in this study were not predictive of VA (all P ≥ 0.225). CONCLUSIONS: The area of the FAZ is significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO and this relationship is modulated by patient age. Further study about FAZ area and VA correlations during the natural course of retinal vascular diseases and following treatment is warranted.
Authors: Gina Yu; Michael T Aaberg; Tapan P Patel; Rahul S Iyengar; Corey Powell; Annie Tran; Caitlin Miranda; Emma Young; Katarina Demetriou; Laxmi Devisetty; Yannis M Paulus Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Giselle Lynch; Jorge S Andrade Romo; Rachel Linderman; Brian D Krawitz; Shelley Mo; Amir Zakik; Joseph Carroll; Richard B Rosen; Toco Y P Chui Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Amy S Babiuch; Michael Han; Felipe F Conti; Karen Wai; Fabiana Q Silva; Rishi P Singh Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 7.389