Literature DB >> 27522422

Effects of diet forage source and neutral detergent fiber content on milk production of dairy cattle and methane emissions determined using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques.

K J Hammond1, A K Jones1, D J Humphries1, L A Crompton1, C K Reynolds2.   

Abstract

Strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from dairy cattle are unlikely to be adopted if production or profitability is reduced. The primary objective of this study was to examine the effects of high maize silage (MS) versus high grass silage (GS) diets, without or with added neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on milk production and methane emission of dairy cattle, using GreenFeed (GF) or respiration chamber (RC) techniques for methane emission measurements. Experiment 1 was 12wk in duration with a randomized block continuous design and 40 Holstein cows (74d in milk) in free-stall housing, assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments (n=10 per treatment), according to calving date, parity, and milk yield. Milk production and dry matter intake (DMI) were measured daily, and milk composition measured weekly, with methane yield (g/kg of DMI) estimated using a GF unit (wk 10 to 12). Experiment 2 was a 4×4 Latin square design with 5-wk periods and 4 dairy cows (114d in milk) fed the same 4 dietary treatments as in experiment 1. Measurements of DMI, milk production, and milk composition occurred in wk 4, and DMI, milk production, and methane yield were measured for 2d in RC during wk 5. Dietary treatments for both experiments were fed as total mixed rations offered ad libitum and containing 500g of silage/kg of dry matter composed (DM basis) of either 75:25 MS:GS (MS) or 25:75 MS:GS (GS), without or with added NDF from chopped straw and soy hulls (+47g of NDF/kg of dry matter). In both experiments, compared with high GS, cows fed high MS had a higher DMI, greater milk production, and lower methane yield (24% lower in experiment 1 using GF and 8% lower in experiment 2 using RC). Added NDF increased (or tended to increase) methane yield for high MS, but not high GS diets. In the separate experiments, the GF and RC methods detected similar dietary treatment effects on methane emission (expressed as g/d and g/kg of DMI), although the magnitude of the differences varied between experiments. Overall methane emission and yield were 448g/d and 20.9g/kg of DMI for experiment 1 using GF and 458g/d and 23.8g/kg of DMI for experiment 2 using RC, respectively.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fiber; forage; methane emission; milk production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27522422     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

Review 1.  Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production: Strategies, Opportunities, and Impact of Reducing Emissions.

Authors:  Byeng-Ryel Min; Seul Lee; Hyunjung Jung; Daniel N Miller; Rui Chen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Fujiang Hou; Atsushi Tsunekawa; Tianhai Yan; Firew Tegegne; Asaminew Tassew; Yeshambel Mekuriaw; Shigdaf Mekuriaw; Beyadglign Hunegnaw; Wondimeneh Mekonnen; Toshiyoshi Ichinohe
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Philip C Garnsworthy; Gareth F Difford; Matthew J Bell; Ali R Bayat; Pekka Huhtanen; Björn Kuhla; Jan Lassen; Nico Peiren; Marcin Pszczola; Diana Sorg; Marleen H P W Visker; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Microbial assemblages and methanogenesis pathways impact methane production and foaming in manure deep-pit storages.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Daniel S Andersen; Steven Trabue; Angela D Kent; Laura M Pepple; Richard S Gates; Adina S Howe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.