Literature DB >> 27522040

Comparative Outcomes after Haploidentical or Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow or Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

Melissa Baker1, Hongkun Wang2, Scott D Rowley3, Ling Cai2, Andrew L Pecora1, Alan Skarbnik1, David H Vesole1, Barbara Adler-Brecher1, Daniel Kim1, Michele L Donato1.   

Abstract

Most patients eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation will require identification of an alternate (unrelated or mismatched related) donor. We explored the transplantation outcomes for a sequential series of 54 patients undergoing haploidentical donor transplantation (HAPLO) compared to those from a control group of patients receiving cells from matched or mismatched unrelated donors (URD) selected by diagnosis and stem cell source. Patients undergoing HAPLO transplantations received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (Cy). Day 15 neutrophil recovery was lower after HAPLO than in URD recipients (43% versus 77%, P < .001), as was day 30 platelet recovery (67% versus 84%, P = .043). HAPLO patients receiving bone marrow achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 17 days and platelet engraftment at a median of 29 days, compared with 16 days and 24 days, respectively, for recipients of peripheral blood stem cells. The incidence of graft failure was similar for both HAPLO and URD recipients (P = .42). HAPLO recipients were more likely to reach donor CD3 chimerism >95% by day 28 after transplantation (88% versus 62%, P = .003). The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at 6 months after transplantation did not differ for these 2 groups (63% for HAPLO and 53% for URD recipients; P = .269), nor did the cumulative incidence of severe grade III/IV aGVHD (13% for HAPLO and 8% for URD recipients; P = .44). The cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD at 2 years did not differ, with probabilities of 24% for HAPLO and 18% for URD recipients (P = .43). The cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation by day 100 after transplantation did not differ (45% for HAPLO and 46% for URD recipients; P = .96). The HAPLO recipients experienced a lower incidence of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation by day 100 (6% versus 32%, P < .001) but a higher incidence of Human Herpesvirus-6 reactivation (35% versus 10%, P = .001). Relapse risk, regimen-related mortality, progression-free survival, and overall survival probabilities did not differ between these 2 groups. These data support the use of HAPLO transplantation with post-transplantation Cy as an alternate transplantation technique for patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors. Transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells does not appear to enhance the speed of neutrophil recovery. The different patterns of viral reactivation require additional studies to explain.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haploidentical transplantation; Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide; Unrelated donor transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27522040     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  10 in total

1.  Reduced-Intensity Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Solid Tumors in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

Authors:  Nicolas J Llosa; Kenneth R Cooke; Allen R Chen; Christopher J Gamper; Orly R Klein; Elias T Zambidis; Brandon Luber; Gary Rosner; Nicholas Siegel; Mary Jo Holuba; Nancy Robey; Masanori Hayashi; Richard J Jones; Ephraim Fuchs; Matthias Holdhoff; David M Loeb; Heather J Symons
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Idarubicin-intensified haploidentical HSCT with GvHD prophylaxis of ATG and basiliximab provides comparable results to sibling donors in high-risk acute leukemia.

Authors:  R Zhang; W Shi; H-F Wang; Y You; Z-D Zhong; W-M Li; C Zhang; X Lu; Y-D Wang; P Zheng; J Fang; M Hong; Q-L Wu; L-H Xia
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Impact of Donor Type and Melphalan Dose on Allogeneic Transplantation Outcomes for Patients with Lymphoma.

Authors:  Neeraj Y Saini; Rima M Saliba; Gabriela Rondon; Farzaneh Maadani; Uday Popat; Chitra M Hosing; Betul Oran; Qaiser Bashir; Amanda Olson; Yago Nieto; Amin Alousi; Partow Kebriaei; Samer Srour; Rohtesh Mehta; Paolo Anderlini; Elizabeth J Shpall; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Issa F Khouri; Luis Fayad; Hun Lee; Nathan Fowler; Simrit Parmar; Jason Westin; Fredrick Hagemeister; Richard E Champlin; Stefan O Ciurea
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Counterpoint.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-02-14

5.  Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Point.

Authors:  Ephraim Joseph Fuchs
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 6.  Alternative Donor Graft Sources for Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Donor for All Patients in 2017!

Authors:  Tamila L Kindwall-Keller; Karen K Ballen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-05-25

7.  Is a matched unrelated donor search needed for all allogeneic transplant candidates?

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Maria Cecilia Borges Bittencourt; Denái R Milton; Kai Cao; Piyanuch Kongtim; Gabriela Rondon; Julianne Chen; Marina Konopleva; Jorge M Ramos Perez; Mohammed F El Shazly; Majdi Aljadayeh; Michele Alvarez; Jin Im; Gheath Al-Atrash; Rohtesh Mehta; Uday Popat; Qaiser Bashir; Betul Oran; Chitra M Hosing; Issa F Khouri; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Incidence and impact of community respiratory viral infections in post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Marcie Riches; Randy Taplitz; Carolyn M Mulroney; Muhammad Bilal Abid; Asad Bashey; Roy F Chemaly; Stefan O Ciurea; Min Chen; Christopher E Dandoy; Miguel A Diaz Perez; Brian D Friend; Ephraim Fuchs; Siddhartha Ganguly; Scott R Goldsmith; Christopher G Kanakry; Soyoung Kim; Krishna V Komanduri; Maxwell M Krem; Hillard M Lazarus; Per Ljungman; Richard Maziarz; Taiga Nishihori; Sagar S Patel; Miguel-Angel Perales; Rizwan Romee; Anurag K Singh; John Reid Wingard; Jean Yared
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.615

9.  Impact on early outcomes and immune reconstitution of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide vs anti-thymocyte globulin after reduced intensity conditioning peripheral blood stem cell allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  Christelle Retière; Catherine Willem; Thierry Guillaume; Henri Vié; Laetitia Gautreau-Rolland; Emmanuel Scotet; Xavier Saulquin; Katia Gagne; Marie C Béné; Berthe-Marie Imbert; Beatrice Clemenceau; Pierre Peterlin; Alice Garnier; Patrice Chevallier
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-27

10.  Similar outcomes after haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched transplantation: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Zhenyang Gu; Li Wang; Lei Yuan; Wenrong Huang; Meng Li; Lixun Guan; Qingyi Wang; Zhe Gao; Shasha Zhao; Lan Luo; Feiyan Wang; Nan Yang; Daihong Liu; Jon C Aster; Chunji Gao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.