Literature DB >> 27521596

Efficiency of mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene on poor ovarian responders during IVF\ICSI procedures: a meta-analysis.

Dan Song1, Yichao Shi1, Yun Zhong1, Qingxia Meng1, Shunyu Hou2, Hong Li3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to provide evidence for evaluating the efficiency of mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol with clomiphene citrate on ovarian stimulation outcome and pregnancy outcome on poor ovarian respond patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.
METHODS: For the current study, a search was carried out for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis was performed on both COH and pregnancy outcomes following the mild COH protocols (CC/Gn/GnRH antagonist) and conventional COH protocols (Gn/GnRH agonist). Outcomes in our analysis were measured in terms of odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models or fixed effect models.
RESULTS: Four RCTs were finally selected to perform this meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant difference for live birth rate (OR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.22-2.29, P=0.57) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.80-1.55, P=0.52) for these two COH protocols. A significant heterogeneity was found when meta-analysis was performed on outcomes such as oocytes retrieved numbers, endometrium thickness, and the cancelled cycles.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggested that mild COH protocol with CC may obtain equal pregnancy outcome on POR patients undergoing IVF treatment compared with that of the conventional COH protocol.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clomiphene citrate; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; In vitro fertilization; Mild stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521596     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  13 in total

Review 1.  Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel's back.

Authors:  Sabahat Rasool; Duru Shah
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2017-10-11

2.  Biobanking of different body fluids within the frame of IVF-a standard operating procedure to improve reproductive biology research.

Authors:  Michael Schenk; Berthold Huppertz; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Darja Kastelic; Martina Hörmann-Kröpfl; Gregor Weiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following fresh and electively frozen single blastocyst transfer in natural cycle and clomiphene-stimulated IVF cycles.

Authors:  K Kato; K Ezoe; A Yabuuchi; J Fukuda; T Kuroda; S Ueno; H Fujita; T Kobayashi
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-04-25

4.  Does the endometrial thickness on the day of the trigger affect the pregnancy outcomes after fresh cleaved embryo transfer in the clomiphene citrate-based minimal stimulation cycle?

Authors:  Seiko Nishihara; Junichiro Fukuda; Kenji Ezoe; Masako Endo; Yuko Nakagawa; Rie Yamadera; Tamotsu Kobayashi; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-06

5.  Accumulation of embryos over 3 natural modified IVF (ICSI) cycles followed by transfer to improve the outcome of poor responders.

Authors:  A K Datta; S Campbell; N Felix; G Nargund
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

6.  Effects of gonadotropin administration on clinical outcomes in clomiphene citrate-based minimal stimulation cycle IVF.

Authors:  Shinya Karakida; Kenji Ezoe; Junichiro Fukuda; Akiko Yabuuchi; Tamotsu Kobayashi; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-12-12

7.  Anti-Müllerian hormone is correlated with cumulative live birth in minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kenji Ezoe; Xiaowen Ni; Tamotsu Kobayashi; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11

9.  Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Montoya-Botero; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Iñaki González-Foruria; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-14

10.  Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrija Kumar Datta; Abha Maheshwari; Nirmal Felix; Stuart Campbell; Geeta Nargund
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.