C Sharp1,2, M McCabe3, H Adamali2, A R Medford2. 1. From the Academic Respiratory Group, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2. North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. 3. Research Department, University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Histological diagnosis by surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is currently limited. Transbronchial cryobiopsy via flexible bronchoscope may this for more patients. The relative costs, diagnostic yields and safety of this approach and more traditional approaches have not been determined. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of transbronchial cryobiopsy, forceps transbronchial biopsy and video assisted (VATS) surgical lung biopsy assessing their relative diagnostic yields and safety. To perform a cost analysis to demonstrate any savings through change to the newer technique. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and EMBASE for all original articles on the diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy, forceps transbronchial biopsy and VATS-biopsy in ILD up to February 2016. Data were extracted on yield and complication rates, in addition to study characteristics. Theoretical cost analysis was performed from local institution financial data, 2015-16 reimbursement tariffs and results of the systematic review. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 11 investigations for transbronchial cryobiopsy, 11 for forceps transbronchial biopsy and 24 for VATS-biopsy revealed diagnostic yields of 84.4% (75.9-91.4%), 64.3% (52.6-75.1%) and 91.1% (84.9-95.7%), respectively. Pneumothorax occurred in 10% (5.4-16.1%) of transbronchial cryobiopsy procedures, moderate bleeding in 20.99% (5.6-42.8%), with three deaths reported. Surgical mortality was 2.3% (1.3-3.6%). Cost analysis demonstrated potential savings of £210 per patient in the first year and £647 in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial cryobiopsy represents a potentially cost-saving approach to improve histological diagnosis in ILD, however is accompanied by a significant risk of moderate bleeding.
BACKGROUND: Histological diagnosis by surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is currently limited. Transbronchial cryobiopsy via flexible bronchoscope may this for more patients. The relative costs, diagnostic yields and safety of this approach and more traditional approaches have not been determined. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of transbronchial cryobiopsy, forceps transbronchial biopsy and video assisted (VATS) surgical lung biopsy assessing their relative diagnostic yields and safety. To perform a cost analysis to demonstrate any savings through change to the newer technique. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and EMBASE for all original articles on the diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy, forceps transbronchial biopsy and VATS-biopsy in ILD up to February 2016. Data were extracted on yield and complication rates, in addition to study characteristics. Theoretical cost analysis was performed from local institution financial data, 2015-16 reimbursement tariffs and results of the systematic review. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 11 investigations for transbronchial cryobiopsy, 11 for forceps transbronchial biopsy and 24 for VATS-biopsy revealed diagnostic yields of 84.4% (75.9-91.4%), 64.3% (52.6-75.1%) and 91.1% (84.9-95.7%), respectively. Pneumothorax occurred in 10% (5.4-16.1%) of transbronchial cryobiopsy procedures, moderate bleeding in 20.99% (5.6-42.8%), with three deaths reported. Surgical mortality was 2.3% (1.3-3.6%). Cost analysis demonstrated potential savings of £210 per patient in the first year and £647 in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial cryobiopsy represents a potentially cost-saving approach to improve histological diagnosis in ILD, however is accompanied by a significant risk of moderate bleeding.
Authors: Christopher J Ryerson; Tamera J Corte; Joyce S Lee; Luca Richeldi; Simon L F Walsh; Jeffrey L Myers; Jürgen Behr; Vincent Cottin; Sonye K Danoff; Kevin R Flaherty; David J Lederer; David A Lynch; Fernando J Martinez; Ganesh Raghu; William D Travis; Zarir Udwadia; Athol U Wells; Harold R Collard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anne M O'Mahony; Louise Burke; Alberto Cavazza; Michael M Maher; Marcus P Kennedy; Michael T Henry Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Fernando J Martinez; Alison Chisholm; Harold R Collard; Kevin R Flaherty; Jeffrey Myers; Ganesh Raghu; Simon L F Walsh; Eric S White; Luca Richeldi Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Nicolas Kahn; Laura Fregonese; Miriam Barrecheguren; Frits M E Franssen; Aleksandar Grgic; Daniela Gompelmann; Eleni Bibaki; Katerina M Antoniou; Janwillem W H Kocks; Hillary Pinnock; Felix Herth Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2017-04-12
Authors: Benjamin Bondue; Thierry Pieters; Patrick Alexander; Paul De Vuyst; Maria Ruiz Patino; Delphine Hoton; Myriam Remmelink; Dimitri Leduc Journal: Pulm Med Date: 2017-04-20