Literature DB >> 27521516

The impact of digging on craniodental morphology and integration.

A F McIntosh1, P G Cox2,3.   

Abstract

The relationship between the form and function of the skull has been the subject of a great deal of research, much of which has concentrated on the impact of feeding on skull shape. However, there are a number of other behaviours that can influence craniodental morphology. Previous work has shown that subterranean rodents that use their incisors to dig (chisel-tooth digging) have a constrained cranial shape, which is probably driven by a necessity to create high bite forces at wide gapes. Chisel-tooth-digging rodents also have an upper incisor root that is displaced further back into the cranium compared with other rodents. This study quantified cranial shape and upper incisors of a phylogenetically diverse sample of rodents to determine if chisel-tooth-digging rodents differ in craniodental morphology. The study showed that the crania of chisel-tooth-digging rodents shared a similar place in morphospace, but a strong phylogenetic signal within the sample meant that this grouping was nonsignificant. It was also found that the curvature of the upper incisor in chisel-tooth diggers was significantly larger than in other rodents. Interestingly, most subterranean rodents in the sample (both chisel-tooth and scratch diggers) had upper incisors that were better able to resist bending than those of terrestrial rodents, presumably due to their similar diets of tough plant materials. Finally, the incisor variables and cranial shape were not found to covary consistently in this sample, highlighting the complex relationship between a species' evolutionary history and functional morphology.
© 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cranial evolution; geometric morphometrics; phylogenetic comparative methods; subterranean rodents

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521516     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  6 in total

1.  Comparative biomechanics of the Pan and Macaca mandibles during mastication: finite element modelling of loading, deformation and strain regimes.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Chris Robinson; Andrea B Taylor; Olga Panagiotopoulou; Julian Davis; Carol V Ward; William H Kimbel; Zeresenay Alemseged; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.661

2.  Biomechanical adaptations for burrowing in the incisor enamel microstructure of Geomyidae and Heteromyidae (Rodentia: Geomyoidea).

Authors:  Daniela C Kalthoff; Thomas Mörs
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Getting a head in hard soils: Convergent skull evolution and divergent allometric patterns explain shape variation in a highly diverse genus of pocket gophers (Thomomys).

Authors:  Ariel E Marcy; Elizabeth A Hadly; Emma Sherratt; Kathleen Garland; Vera Weisbecker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Convergent evolution of an extreme dietary specialisation, the olfactory system of worm-eating rodents.

Authors:  Quentin Martinez; Renaud Lebrun; Anang S Achmadi; Jacob A Esselstyn; Alistair R Evans; Lawrence R Heaney; Roberto Portela Miguez; Kevin C Rowe; Pierre-Henri Fabre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Burrow systems evince non-solitary geomyid rodents from the Paleogene of southern Mexico.

Authors:  Rosalía Guerrero-Arenas; Eduardo Jiménez-Hidalgo; Jorge Fernando Genise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The biomechanical significance of the elongated rodent incisor root in the mandible during incision.

Authors:  Philip J R Morris; Philip G Cox; Samuel N F Cobb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.