Literature DB >> 27521410

Performance of an integrated network model: Evaluation of the first 4 years.

François Lehmann1, David Dunn2, Marie-Dominique Beaulieu3, James Brophy4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in accessibility, patients' care experiences, and quality-of-care indicators following a clinic's transformation into a fully integrated network clinic.
DESIGN: Mixed-methods study.
SETTING: Verdun, Que. PARTICIPANTS: Data on all patient visits were used, in addition to 2 distinct patient cohorts: 134 patients with chronic illness (ie, diabetes, arteriosclerotic heart disease, or both); and 450 women between the ages of 20 and 70 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accessibility was measured by the number of walk-in visits, scheduled visits, and new patient enrolments. With the first cohort, patients' care experiences were measured using validated serial questionnaires; and quality-of-care indicators were measured using biologic data. With the second cohort, quality of preventive care was measured using the number of Papanicolaou tests performed as a surrogate marker.
RESULTS: Despite a negligible increase in the number of physicians, there was an increase in accessibility after the clinic's transition to an integrated network model. During the first 4 years of operation, the number of scheduled visits more than doubled, nonscheduled visits (walk-in visits) increased by 29%, and enrolment of vulnerable patients (those with chronic illnesses) at the clinic remained high. Patient satisfaction with doctors was rated very highly at all points of time that were evaluated. While the number of Pap tests done did not increase with time, the proportion of patients meeting hemoglobin A1c and low-density lipoprotein guideline target levels increased, as did the number of patients tested for microalbuminuria.
CONCLUSION: Transformation to an integrated network model of care led to increased efficiency and enhanced accessibility with no negative effects on the doctor-patient relationship. Improvements in biologic data also suggested better quality of care. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521410      PMCID: PMC4982743     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  16 in total

1.  AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Sidney C Smith; Jerilyn Allen; Steven N Blair; Robert O Bonow; Lawrence M Brass; Gregg C Fonarow; Scott M Grundy; Loren Hiratzka; Daniel Jones; Harlan M Krumholz; Lori Mosca; Richard C Pasternak; Thomas Pearson; Marc A Pfeffer; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care.

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Jeannie Haggerty; Pierre Tousignant; Janet Barnsley; William Hogg; Robert Geneau; Éveline Hudon; Réjean Duplain; Jean-Louis Denis; Lucie Bonin; Claudio Del Grande; Natalyia Dragieva
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult - 2009 recommendations.

Authors:  Jacques Genest; Ruth McPherson; Jiri Frohlich; Todd Anderson; Norm Campbell; André Carpentier; Patrick Couture; Robert Dufour; George Fodor; Gordon A Francis; Steven Grover; Milan Gupta; Robert A Hegele; David C Lau; Lawrence Leiter; Gary F Lewis; Eva Lonn; G B John Mancini; Dominic Ng; Glen J Pearson; Allan Sniderman; James A Stone; Ehud Ur
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Quality of care in diabetic patients attending routine primary care clinics compared with those attending GP specialist clinics.

Authors:  H Ismail; J Wright; P Rhodes; A Scally
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Eric C Schneider; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kevin G Volpp; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Respectfulness from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.

Authors:  Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; Raynald Pineault; Jeannie L Haggerty; Frederick Burge; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; David Gass; Darcy A Santor; Christine Beaulieu
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-12

7.  Validation of instruments to evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective: overview of the method.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Frederick Burge; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Raynald Pineault; Christine Beaulieu; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; Darcy A Santor; David Gass; Beverley Lawson
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-12

8.  Interpersonal communication from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Jeannie L Haggerty; Christine Beaulieu; Fatima Bouharaoui; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; Raynald Pineault; Frederick Burge; Darcy A Santor
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-12

9.  Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Richard H Glazier; Julie Klein-Geltink; Alexander Kopp; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation.

Authors:  Robert J Reid; Paul A Fishman; Onchee Yu; Tyler R Ross; James T Tufano; Michael P Soman; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.