Literature DB >> 27521179

Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people.

W You1, L J Liu2, H X Chen2, J Y Xiong2, D M Wang2, J H Huang3, J L Ding2, D P Wang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and clinical potential of using the 3D printing technology (3DPT) versus typical strategy (thin-layer CT scan) for the treatment of complicated proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in old people.
METHODS: Sixty-six old patients age ranging from 61 to 76 years with persistent complicated PHFs were randomly assigned to two groups as per the controlled randomization table (34 cases in the test group and 32 cases in the control group). In the test group, 3DPT was applied to build the 3D facture model of a patient, according to the data acquired from the thin-layer CT scan and subsequently processed with Mimics software. This helped to confirm the diagnosis, design the individual operation plan, simulate the surgical procedures and perform the surgery as plan. In the control group, only thin-layer CT scan was applied for the design of the operation plan prior to the surgery. Here, parameters including surgery duration, blood loss volume during surgery, the number of fluoroscopy, time to union were statistically analyzed for two groups after the operation. The screw lengths designed before the surgery and measured during the surgery were compared.
RESULTS: The 3D PHF model generated using 3DPT was able to provide the visual display and omni-directional observation of the direction and severity of the fracture dislocation, which facilitated preoperative diagnosis, operation planning and design, data measurement, preselection of internal fixator and surgical outcome simulation. According to the follow-up ranging from 12∼28 months for the 66 patients, the results showed no significant difference in time to union between the two groups (P>0.05). Apart from that, less surgery duration, less blood loss during surgery, less number of fluoroscopy can be observed compared with the control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 3DPT showed great clinical feasibility of the treatment of complicated PHFs. The 3D-print PHF model had the ability to clearly display the fracture and thus was useful to determine the fracture classification and the magnitude of fracture injury. It benefited surgeons to gain a better understanding of complicated PHFs, design a most suitable operation plan prior to surgery and facilitate the doctor-patient communication. This therefore enabled the reduction of intraoperative injury and the optimization of surgical outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Computer-aided orthopaedic surgery; Old patients; Proximal humeral fracture; Thin-layer CT scan

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521179     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  19 in total

Review 1.  [3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery].

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Nico Bruns; S Razaeian; J D Clausen; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Helen Hg Handoll; Joanne Elliott; Theis M Thillemann; Patricia Aluko; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  3D-Printed Models versus CT Scan and X-Rays Imaging in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Triple-Blind Interobserver Reliability Comparison Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Puglisi; Marco Montemagno; Regina Denaro; Giuseppe Condorelli; Vincenzo Fabrizio Caruso; Andrea Vescio; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  CORR Insights®: 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Mohit Kumar Patralekh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 6.  Clinical efficacy and effectiveness of 3D printing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura E Diment; Mark S Thompson; Jeroen H M Bergmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Proximal third humeral shaft fractures fixed with long helical PHILOS plates in elderly patients: benefit of pre-contouring plates on a 3D-printed model-a retrospective study.

Authors:  Qiuke Wang; Jian Hu; Junjie Guan; Yunfeng Chen; Lei Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; Yang-Guk Chung; Ji Seok Jang; Yongdeok Kim; Soo Bin Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  The current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry Robb; Gemma Scrimgeour; Piers Boshier; Anna Przedlacka; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Gina Brown; Fernando Bello; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Nano-biphasic calcium phosphate/polyvinyl alcohol composites with enhanced bioactivity for bone repair via low-temperature three-dimensional printing and loading with platelet-rich fibrin.

Authors:  Yue Song; Kaifeng Lin; Shu He; Chunmei Wang; Shuaishuai Zhang; Donglin Li; Jimeng Wang; Tianqing Cao; Long Bi; Guoxian Pei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.