Literature DB >> 27521041

Predictors of high cost after bariatric surgery: A single institution review.

Neil Shah1, Jacob A Greenberg2, Glen Leverson3, Luke M Funk4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drivers of high cost care after bariatric operation have not been well described. We sought to compare 1-year costs between patients who underwent laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and identify predictors of high cost of care.
METHODS: Morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (n = 74) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 270) at a single institution from 2010-2014 were identified. Patient demographic characteristics, surgeon age, 90-day and 1-year surgical outcomes, and facility cost data were collected. "High cost" patients were defined as those in the top quartile of costs among all patients. Variables hypothesized a priori to be associated with high total costs were included in a bivariate logistic regression model. Those with a P value < .1 were included in a multivariable logistic regression model with "high cost" as the outcome.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy was associated with slightly greater median total 1-year costs ($18,234 vs $17,151; P = .021) and inpatient costs ($15,026 vs $13,990; P = .019). On multivariable analysis, having Medicaid (odds ratio 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-5.06) compared with private insurance, being readmitted to the hospital (odds ratio 5.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-12.26), and experiencing a postoperative complication (odds ratio 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-9.48) were associated with high-cost care.
CONCLUSION: Suboptimal operative outcomes seem to be the primary driver of high overall costs after bariatric operation. Improving postoperative outcomes may result in substantial cost savings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521041     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Patient-reported quality of life after bariatric surgery: a single institution analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Vegel; Neil Shah; Anne O Lidor; Jacob A Greenberg; Ying Shan; Xing Wang; Luke M Funk
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Edwin Acevedo; Michael Mazzei; Huaqing Zhao; Xiaoning Lu; Michael A Edwards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Low Urologist Density Predicts High-Cost Surgical Treatment of Stone Disease.

Authors:  David B Bayne; Manuel Armas-Phan; Sudarshan Srirangapatanam; Justin Ahn; Timothy T Brown; Marshall Stoller; Thomas L Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Perioperative Cost Differences Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Institutional Review.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Murtha; Dillon C Svoboda; Natalie Liu; Morgan K Johnson; Manasa Venkatesh; Jacob A Greenberg; Anne O Lidor; Luke M Funk
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.766

5.  Concurrent hiatal hernia repair and bariatric surgery: outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kristina H Lewis; Katherine Callaway; Stephanie Argetsinger; Jamie Wallace; David E Arterburn; Fang Zhang; Adolfo Fernandez; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Justin B Dimick; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.734

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.