Literature DB >> 27520753

The Role of Metabolites of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Depression.

M V Rudorfer1, W Z Potter2.   

Abstract

Recognition of the role of active metabolites in mediating therapeutic and/or adverse effects of many antidepressants is an important part of understanding the mechanisms of action of these medications. While virtually all antidepressants except lithium undergo extensive hepatic metabolism, the profile of activity of the resulting breakdown products varies considerably.The metabolites of some antidepressants share the primary biochemical actions of their parent compounds and appear to contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of those medications. Examples of this are the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) nor-triptyline, the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine and the serotonin-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine. Less commonly, the activity of the primary metabolite may differ from that of the parent drug. An example is clomipramine. This drug is a potent serotonin reuptake blocking TCA, but its demethyl-metabolites are noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. On the other hand, a number of effective anti-depressants, including most of the SSRIs other than fluoxetine, lack active metabolites.On the negative side, antidepressant metabolites may add to the adverse effect burden presented by their drugs of origin. At sufficiently high doses, the amphetamines resulting from the metabolism of some monoamine oxidase inhibitors, e.g. selegiline (deprenyl), may directly produce toxicity from the pharmacodynamic interaction with the parent antidepressant. While hydroxy-nortriptyline produces lesser anticholinergic effects than its parent compound, this metabolite may block the therapeutic action of nortriptyline when present in high concentrations. Excessive plasma concentrations of the major metabolite of amfebutamone (bupropion) have been associated with nonresponse and clinical worsening in some patients.Amfebutamone also illustrates the importance of pharmacokinetic factors in determining the magnitude of the influence of metabolites on antidepressant action. Active metabolites that have long elimination half-lives may predominate over the parent compound in plasma and CSF, exerting considerable clinical impact. With several of the newer drugs, notably amfebutamone, venlafaxine and nefazodone, the presence of active metabolites with half-lives approaching 1 day suggests that once-daily administration may be sufficient.The formation of most antidepressant metabolites is under strong genetic control and the metabolites themselves often exert effects on hepatic enzyme systems. This can lead to the possibility of drug-drug interactions. A key example is norfluoxetine, which is associated with potent inhibition of the cytochrome P450 isozyme 2D6 (and, consequently, reduced metabolism of drugs such as TCAs). This effect lasts for weeks even after fluoxetine discontinuation, due to the fact that norfluoxetine has a half-life of up to 2 weeks.The clearance of most antidepressant metabolites is ultimately dependent on elimination by the kidneys. Therefore, these substances tend to accumulate in states of reduced renal function, including normal aging. The relative increase in TCA hydroxy-metabolite concentrations in the elderly may contribute to the cardiovascular and other toxicities of these antidepressants in this vulnerable patient population.Attention to the existence and implications of active metabolites from the earliest stages of antidepressant drug development may help optimise the benefit: risk ratio of this valuable class of psychotropic medications.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 27520753     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-199707040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  255 in total

Review 1.  Cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases and interactions of psychotropic drugs.

Authors:  W W Shen; K M Lin
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.210

2.  Effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to meta-chlorophenylpiperazine in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  E Hollander; C DeCaria; R Gully; A Nitescu; R F Suckow; J M Gorman; D F Klein; M R Liebowitz
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Further studies of the putative serotonin agonist, m-chlorophenylpiperazine: evidence for a serotonin receptor mediated mechanism of action in humans.

Authors:  E A Mueller; D L Murphy; T Sunderland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: reversible and irreversible.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1992

5.  The nonlinear kinetics of desipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine in plasma.

Authors:  R G Cooke; J J Warsh; H C Stancer; K L Reed; E Persad
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Pharmacokinetics of desipramine coadministered with sertraline or fluoxetine.

Authors:  S H Preskorn; J Alderman; M Chung; W Harrison; M Messig; S Harris
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.153

7.  Pharmacokinetically designed double-blind placebo-controlled study of nortriptyline in 6- to 12-year-olds with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  B Geller; T B Cooper; D L Graham; H H Fetner; F A Marsteller; J M Wells
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.829

8.  A dose-response study of intravenous m-chlorophenylpiperazine in normal subjects.

Authors:  O Kalus; S Wetzler; R S Kahn; G M Asnis; H M van Praag
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Pharmacokinetics of amoxapine and its active metabolites.

Authors:  B Calvo; M J García; J L Pedraz; E L Mariño; A Domínguez-Gil
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1985-04

Review 10.  Comparative tolerability profiles of the newer versus older antidepressants.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; H K Manji; W Z Potter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more
  6 in total

1.  Recent Findings of the Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder: Do We Now Know What to Prescribe?

Authors:  Matthew V Rudorfer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  A novel prodrug strategy to improve the oral absorption of O-desmethylvenlafaxine.

Authors:  Mingyuan Liu; Yantong Sun; Sen Zhao; Youxin Li; Riyang Piao; Yan Yang; Jingkai Gu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Metabolism of the newer antidepressants. An overview of the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic implications.

Authors:  S Caccia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Choosing appropriate antidepressant therapy in the elderly. A risk-benefit assessment of available agents.

Authors:  A J Flint
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; W Z Potter
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics of antidepressants in patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Massimo Carlo Mauri; Alessio Fiorentini; Silvia Paletta; Alfredo Carlo Altamura
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.