Literature DB >> 27520752

Central Stimulant Treatment of Childhood Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder : Issues and Recommendations from a US Perspective.

D J Safer1.   

Abstract

The use of CNS stimulants for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children has steadily increased in most areas of the world over the last 30 years. In mid-1995, at least 1.5 million US children were receiving methylphenidate or dexamphetamine (dextroamphetamine). However, in other countries these agents are not used as widely.Specific stimulant-induced benefits for children with ADHD include: improved school grades, more completed classroom work, fewer reprimands for disruptive behaviour, improved handwriting, and improved behaviour at home and in social situtions. Stimulants benefit at least 75% of children with ADHD and are remarkably well tolerated, having few (for the most part minor and temporary) adverse effects.However, the benefits of stimulants that are obvious in most patients with ADHD during a brief clinical trial are primarily symptomatic. Although the behavioural benefits of stimulants are generally present during each period of treatment for as long as the ADHD condition exists (and children with ADHD are now often staying on stimulant medication into their mid-teens), the treatment has not been shown to change the long term outcome of the disorder.Before prescribing stimulants, paediatric physicians need to perform a careful diagnostic assessment for ADHD using multiple sources of information, including detailed ratings of the child's behaviour from his/her teachers and from a parent. If at baseline, the child's academic and behavioural adjustment in the classroom is good, stimulant medication would be inappropriate. However, if the child's pattern of ADHD has consistently and seriously interfered with his/her classroom and home adjustment, stimulant treatment should be actively considered. Should stimulant therapy be initiated, knowledgeable medical follow-up is required.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 27520752     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-199707040-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  30 in total

1.  Clinical effects of methylphenidate and thioridazine in intellectually subaverage children.

Authors:  M G Aman; R E Marks; S H Turbott; C P Wilsher; S N Merry
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 2.  Medical use of psychostimulants: an overview.

Authors:  V F Holmes
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.210

3.  Absence of tolerance to the behavioral effects of methylphenidate in hyperactive and inattentive children.

Authors:  D J Safer; R P Allen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Effects of methylphenidate on adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder and ADDH: a preliminary report.

Authors:  S L Kaplan; J Busner; S Kupietz; E Wassermann; B Segal
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Pharmacotherapy for behavior disorders. Typical treatment practices.

Authors:  K D Gadow
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample.

Authors:  M L Wolraich; J N Hannah; T Y Pinnock; A Baumgaertel; J Brown
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Which boys respond to stimulant medication? A controlled trial of methylphenidate in boys with disruptive behaviour.

Authors:  E Taylor; R Schachar; G Thorley; H M Wieselberg; B Everitt; M Rutter
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Dextroamphetamine. Its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men.

Authors:  J L Rapoport; M S Buchsbaum; H Weingartner; T P Zahn; C Ludlow; E J Mikkelsen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1980-08

9.  Hepatotoxicity due to pemoline (Cylert): a report of two cases.

Authors:  D S Pratt; R S Dubois
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Effect of a media blitz and a threatened lawsuit on stimulant treatment.

Authors:  D J Safer; J M Krager
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Extended-release methylphenidate (Ritalin LA).

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Reboxetine versus methylphenidate in treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Fariba Arabgol; Leily Panaghi; Paria Hebrani
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 3.  Atomoxetine.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Dexmethylphenidate.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; David P Figgitt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A comparison of the effects of reboxetine and placebo on reaction time in adults with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  F Hashemian; S Mohammadian; F Riahi; P Ghaeli; D Ghodsi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.