Literature DB >> 27519782

A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study.

David Kaplan1, Jianshen Chen2.   

Abstract

A two-step Bayesian propensity score approach is introduced that incorporates prior information in the propensity score equation and outcome equation without the problems associated with simultaneous Bayesian propensity score approaches. The corresponding variance estimators are also provided. The two-step Bayesian propensity score is provided for three methods of implementation: propensity score stratification, weighting, and optimal full matching. Three simulation studies and one case study are presented to elaborate the proposed two-step Bayesian propensity score approach. Results of the simulation studies reveal that greater precision in the propensity score equation yields better recovery of the frequentist-based treatment effect. A slight advantage is shown for the Bayesian approach in small samples. Results also reveal that greater precision around the wrong treatment effect can lead to seriously distorted results. However, greater precision around the correct treatment effect parameter yields quite good results, with slight improvement seen with greater precision in the propensity score equation. A comparison of coverage rates for the conventional frequentist approach and proposed Bayesian approach is also provided. The case study reveals that credible intervals are wider than frequentist confidence intervals when priors are non-informative.

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; propensity score analysis

Year:  2012        PMID: 27519782     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9262-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

1.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter M Steiner; Thomas D Cook; William R Shadish; M H Clark
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-09

4.  A Systematic Review of Propensity Score Methods in the Social Sciences.

Authors:  Felix J Thoemmes; Eun Sook Kim
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research.

Authors:  S M Perkins; W Tu; M G Underhill; X H Zhou; M D Murray
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.

Authors:  Lawrence C McCandless; Paul Gustafson; Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.

Authors:  D B Rubin; N Thomas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies.

Authors:  W G Cochran
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Bayesian mediation analysis.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-12
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.

Authors:  Hwanhee Hong; Kara E Rudolph; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  The Central Role of Bayes' Theorem for Joint Estimation of Causal Effects and Propensity Scores.

Authors:  Corwin Matthew Zigler
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 8.710

3.  Bayesian Model Averaging for Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  David Kaplan; Jianshen Chen
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Bayesian Causality.

Authors:  Pierre Baldi; Babak Shahbaba
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 8.710

5.  Uncertainty in the design stage of two-stage Bayesian propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Shirley X Liao; Corwin M Zigler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Causal inference with large‑scale assessments in education from a Bayesian perspective: a review and synthesis.

Authors:  David Kaplan
Journal:  Large Scale Assess Educ       Date:  2016-05-03

7.  A method for measuring the effect of certified electronic health record technology on childhood immunization status scores among Medicaid managed care network providers.

Authors:  Paul J Messino; Hadi Kharrazi; Julia M Kim; Harold Lehmann
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 6.317

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.