Literature DB >> 27519683

A Tabu-Search Heuristic for Deterministic Two-Mode Blockmodeling of Binary Network Matrices.

Michael Brusco1, Douglas Steinley2.   

Abstract

Two-mode binary data matrices arise in a variety of social network contexts, such as the attendance or non-attendance of individuals at events, the participation or lack of participation of groups in projects, and the votes of judges on cases. A popular method for analyzing such data is two-mode blockmodeling based on structural equivalence, where the goal is to identify partitions for the row and column objects such that the clusters of the row and column objects form blocks that are either complete (all 1s) or null (all 0s) to the greatest extent possible. Multiple restarts of an object relocation heuristic that seeks to minimize the number of inconsistencies (i.e., 1s in null blocks and 0s in complete blocks) with ideal block structure is the predominant approach for tackling this problem. As an alternative, we propose a fast and effective implementation of tabu search. Computational comparisons across a set of 48 large network matrices revealed that the new tabu-search heuristic always provided objective function values that were better than those of the relocation heuristic when the two methods were constrained to the same amount of computation time.

Keywords:  blockmodeling; clustering; heuristics; tabu search; two-mode networks

Year:  2011        PMID: 27519683     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-011-9221-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

1.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman; M Girvan
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-02-26

2.  K-balance partitioning: an exact method with applications to generalized structural balance and other psychological contexts.

Authors:  Michael Brusco; Douglas Steinley
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-06

3.  A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data.

Authors:  Amela Prelić; Stefan Bleuler; Philip Zimmermann; Anja Wille; Peter Bühlmann; Wilhelm Gruissem; Lars Hennig; Lothar Thiele; Eckart Zitzler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: a survey.

Authors:  Sara C Madeira; Arlindo L Oliveira
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Biclustering sparse binary genomic data.

Authors:  Miranda van Uitert; Wouter Meuleman; Lodewyk Wessels
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A nonparametric view of network models and Newman-Girvan and other modularities.

Authors:  Peter J Bickel; Aiyou Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  K-means may perform as well as mixture model clustering but may also be much worse: comment on Steinley and Brusco (2011).

Authors:  Jeroen K Vermunt
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-03

8.  Commentary on Steinley and Brusco (2011): recommendations and cautions.

Authors:  Geoffrey J McLachlan
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-03

9.  Evaluating mixture modeling for clustering: recommendations and cautions.

Authors:  Douglas Steinley; Michael J Brusco
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-03

10.  Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels.

Authors:  Edoardo M Airoldi; David M Blei; Stephen E Fienberg; Eric P Xing
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.654

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Multiobjective blockmodeling for social network analysis.

Authors:  Michael Brusco; Patrick Doreian; Douglas Steinley; Cinthia B Satornino
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Detecting Clusters/Communities in Social Networks.

Authors:  Michaela Hoffman; Douglas Steinley; Kathleen M Gates; Mitchell J Prinstein; Michael J Brusco
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A method for making inferences in network analysis: Comment on Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017).

Authors:  Douglas Steinley; Michaela Hoffman; Michael J Brusco; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2017-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.