Michelle M Stein1, Cara L Hrusch1, Justyna Gozdz1, Erika von Mutius1, Donata Vercelli1, Carole Ober1, Anne I Sperling1, Catherine Igartua1, Vadim Pivniouk1, Sean E Murray1, Julie G Ledford1, Mauricius Marques Dos Santos1, Rebecca L Anderson1, Nervana Metwali1, Julia W Neilson1, Raina M Maier1, Jack A Gilbert1, Mark Holbreich1, Peter S Thorne1, Fernando D Martinez1. 1. Department of Human Genetics (M.M. Stein, C.I., R.L.A., C.O.), the Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and the Committee on Immunology (C.L.H., A.I.S.), the Department of Ecology and Evolution (J.A.G.), and the Department of Surgery (J.A.G.), University of Chicago, Chicago, and the Institute for Genomic and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne (J.A.G.) - all in Illinois; the NIEHS Training Program in Environmental Toxicology and Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine (J.G.), and the Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (V.P., D.V.), Medicine (J.G.L.), Chemical and Environmental Engineering (M. Marques dos Santos), and Soil, Water, and Environmental Science (J.W.N., R.M.M.), University of Arizona, and the Arizona Respiratory Center and Bio5 Institute (J.G., V.P., S.E.M., J.G.L., F.D.M., D.V.) - all in Tucson; the Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City (N.M., P.S.T.); Allergy and Asthma Consultants, Indianapolis (M.H.); and Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany (E.M.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Amish and Hutterites are U.S. agricultural populations whose lifestyles are remarkably similar in many respects but whose farming practices, in particular, are distinct; the former follow traditional farming practices whereas the latter use industrialized farming practices. The populations also show striking disparities in the prevalence of asthma, and little is known about the immune responses underlying these disparities. METHODS: We studied environmental exposures, genetic ancestry, and immune profiles among 60 Amish and Hutterite children, measuring levels of allergens and endotoxins and assessing the microbiome composition of indoor dust samples. Whole blood was collected to measure serum IgE levels, cytokine responses, and gene expression, and peripheral-blood leukocytes were phenotyped with flow cytometry. The effects of dust extracts obtained from Amish and Hutterite homes on immune and airway responses were assessed in a murine model of experimental allergic asthma. RESULTS: Despite the similar genetic ancestries and lifestyles of Amish and Hutterite children, the prevalence of asthma and allergic sensitization was 4 and 6 times as low in the Amish, whereas median endotoxin levels in Amish house dust was 6.8 times as high. Differences in microbial composition were also observed in dust samples from Amish and Hutterite homes. Profound differences in the proportions, phenotypes, and functions of innate immune cells were also found between the two groups of children. In a mouse model of experimental allergic asthma, the intranasal instillation of dust extracts from Amish but not Hutterite homes significantly inhibited airway hyperreactivity and eosinophilia. These protective effects were abrogated in mice that were deficient in MyD88 and Trif, molecules that are critical in innate immune signaling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our studies in humans and mice indicate that the Amish environment provides protection against asthma by engaging and shaping the innate immune response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
BACKGROUND: The Amish and Hutterites are U.S. agricultural populations whose lifestyles are remarkably similar in many respects but whose farming practices, in particular, are distinct; the former follow traditional farming practices whereas the latter use industrialized farming practices. The populations also show striking disparities in the prevalence of asthma, and little is known about the immune responses underlying these disparities. METHODS: We studied environmental exposures, genetic ancestry, and immune profiles among 60 Amish and Hutterite children, measuring levels of allergens and endotoxins and assessing the microbiome composition of indoor dust samples. Whole blood was collected to measure serum IgE levels, cytokine responses, and gene expression, and peripheral-blood leukocytes were phenotyped with flow cytometry. The effects of dust extracts obtained from Amish and Hutterite homes on immune and airway responses were assessed in a murine model of experimental allergic asthma. RESULTS: Despite the similar genetic ancestries and lifestyles of Amish and Hutterite children, the prevalence of asthma and allergic sensitization was 4 and 6 times as low in the Amish, whereas median endotoxin levels in Amish house dust was 6.8 times as high. Differences in microbial composition were also observed in dust samples from Amish and Hutterite homes. Profound differences in the proportions, phenotypes, and functions of innate immune cells were also found between the two groups of children. In a mouse model of experimental allergic asthma, the intranasal instillation of dust extracts from Amish but not Hutterite homes significantly inhibited airway hyperreactivity and eosinophilia. These protective effects were abrogated in mice that were deficient in MyD88 and Trif, molecules that are critical in innate immune signaling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our studies in humans and mice indicate that the Amish environment provides protection against asthma by engaging and shaping the innate immune response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
Authors: Howard M Cann; Claudia de Toma; Lucien Cazes; Marie-Fernande Legrand; Valerie Morel; Laurence Piouffre; Julia Bodmer; Walter F Bodmer; Batsheva Bonne-Tamir; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Zhu Chen; J Chu; Carlo Carcassi; Licinio Contu; Ruofu Du; Laurent Excoffier; G B Ferrara; Jonathan S Friedlaender; Helena Groot; David Gurwitz; Trefor Jenkins; Rene J Herrera; Xiaoyi Huang; Judith Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Andre Langaney; Alice A Lin; S Qasim Mehdi; Peter Parham; Alberto Piazza; Maria Pia Pistillo; Yaping Qian; Qunfang Shu; Jiujin Xu; S Zhu; James L Weber; Henry T Greely; Marcus W Feldman; Gilles Thomas; Jean Dausset; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza Journal: Science Date: 2002-04-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Georg J Loss; Martin Depner; Alexander J Hose; Jon Genuneit; Anne M Karvonen; Anne Hyvärinen; Caroline Roduit; Michael Kabesch; Roger Lauener; Petra Ina Pfefferle; Juha Pekkanen; Jean-Charles Dalphin; Josef Riedler; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Erika von Mutius; Markus J Ege Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Markus J Ege; Melanie Mayer; Anne-Cécile Normand; Jon Genuneit; William O C M Cookson; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Dick Heederik; Renaud Piarroux; Erika von Mutius Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Fortunati; K M Kazemier; J C Grutters; L Koenderman; van J M M Van den Bosch Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Markus J Ege; David P Strachan; William O C M Cookson; Miriam F Moffatt; Ivo Gut; Mark Lathrop; Michael Kabesch; Jon Genuneit; Gisela Büchele; Barbara Sozanska; Andrzej Boznanski; Paul Cullinan; Elisabeth Horak; Christian Bieli; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Dick Heederik; Erika von Mutius Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: William J Sheehan; Jonathan M Gaffin; David B Peden; Robert K Bush; Wanda Phipatanakul Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Hira Mohyuddin; Polymnia Georgiou; Abhishek Wadhawan; Melanie L Daue; Lisa A Brenner; Claudia Gragnoli; Erika F H Saunders; Dietmar Fuchs; Christopher A Lowry; Teodor T Postolache Journal: Pteridines Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 0.581
Authors: Anne Straumfors; Oda A H Foss; Janina Fuss; Steen K Mollerup; Håvard Kauserud; Sunil Mundra Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Se Jin Song; Douglas C Woodhams; Cameron Martino; Celeste Allaband; Andre Mu; Sandrine Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery; Jan S Suchodolski; Rob Knight Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2019-02-18
Authors: Erika von Mutius; Juha Pekkanen; Pirkka V Kirjavainen; Anne M Karvonen; Rachel I Adams; Martin Täubel; Marjut Roponen; Pauli Tuoresmäki; Georg Loss; Balamuralikrishna Jayaprakash; Martin Depner; Markus Johannes Ege; Harald Renz; Petra Ina Pfefferle; Bianca Schaub; Roger Lauener; Anne Hyvärinen; Rob Knight; Dick J J Heederik Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jennifer Therkorn; Leonardo Calderon; Benton Cartledge; Nirmala Thomas; Brian Majestic; Gediminas Mainelis Journal: Environ Sci Nano Date: 2018-01-03
Authors: Nandini Krishnamoorthy; David N Douda; Thayse R Brüggemann; Isabell Ricklefs; Melody G Duvall; Raja-Elie E Abdulnour; Kimberly Martinod; Luciana Tavares; Xiao Wang; Manuela Cernadas; Elliot Israel; David T Mauger; Eugene R Bleecker; Mario Castro; Serpil C Erzurum; Benjamin M Gaston; Nizar N Jarjour; Sally Wenzel; Eleanor Dunican; John V Fahy; Daniel Irimia; Denisa D Wagner; Bruce D Levy Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2018-08-03