| Literature DB >> 27517841 |
Sung Hyun Yoon1, Young Hoon Kim1, Yoon Jin Lee1, Jihoon Park1, Jin Won Kim2, Hye Seung Lee3, Bohyoung Kim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Image texture analysis is a noninvasive technique for quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity, with derived texture features reported to be closely related to the treatment outcome of tumors. Gastric cancer is one of the most common tumors and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although trastuzumab is associated with a survival gain among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer, optimal patient selection is challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine whether CT texture features of HER2-positive gastric cancer were related to the survival rate after trastuzumab treatment. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27517841 PMCID: PMC4982686 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients’ characteristics.
| Total | Good survival | Poor survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (range) | 63 (42–80) | 63.1 (42–80) | 61.8 (46–74) | 0.644 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 24 (92.3%) | 16 (88.9%) | 8 (100%) | 1.000 |
| Female | 2 (7.7%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | |
| ECOG | ||||
| 0 | 2 (7.7%) | 1 (5.6%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
| 1 | 20 (76.9%) | 17 (94.4%) | 3 (37.5%) | |
| 2 | 3 (11.5%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (37.5%) | |
| 3 | 1 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.026 |
| Tumor location | ||||
| Gastroesophageal junction | 3 (11.5%) | 3 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Other stomach | 23 (88.5%) | 15 (83.3%) | 8 (100%) | 0.529 |
| Pathology type | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 25 (96.2%) | 17 (94.4%) | 8 (100%) | |
| Signet ring cell | 1 (3.8%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 1.000 |
| Other | 0 (0%) | |||
| Follow-up duration | ||||
| Median months (range) | 18.6 (0.2–50.8) | 24.3 (13.5–50.8) | 5.4 (0.2–10.5) | <0.001 |
| Overall survival | ||||
| Median months (95% CI) | 18.6 (14.7–25.5) | 24.3 (21.9–31.9) | 5.4 (2.5–7.7)) | <0.001 |
Note.–ECOG = Estern Cooperative Oncology Group, CI = confidence interval.
Results of the derived ROC threshold values for texture.
| Texture variable | ROC threshold | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | ≤0.0412×10−2 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 0.639 | 0.429–0.816 | 0.260 |
| Contrast | >265.8480 | 72.22 | 87.50 | 0.771 | 0.565–0.911 | 0.004 |
| Entropy | >7.7984 | 61.11 | 87.50 | 0.611 | 0.402–0.794 | 0.346 |
| Variance | >488.3150 | 72.22 | 72.22 | 0.750 | 0.543–0.897 | 0.011 |
| Correlation | ≤0.1319×10−3 | 83.33 | 87.50 | 0.771 | 0.565–0.911 | 0.013 |
| Kurtosis | ≤0.6805 | 100.00 | 25.00 | 0.556 | 0.349–0.748 | 0.659 |
| Skewness | ≤-0.1092 | 55.56 | 75.00 | 0.597 | 0.388–0.783 | 0.437 |
Fig 1Kaplan–Meier curves according to texture features.
Kaplan–Meier curves showed a significant difference in survival according to (a) ASM, (b) contrast, (c) variance, and (d) correlation, with log-rank P values of .027, .023, .037, and .001, respectively.
Results of the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.
| Texture variable | ROC threshold | Median survival in months (number of patients) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Above threshold | Below threshold | |||
| ASM | ≤ 0.0412×10−2 | 15.6 (17) | 29.1 (9) | 0.027 |
| Contrast | > 265.8480 | 36.6 (15) | 10.5 (11) | 0.023 |
| Entropy | >7.7984 | 29.1 (13) | 36.6 (13) | 0.691 |
| Variance | > 488.3150 | 50.8 (15) | 10.5 (11) | 0.037 |
| Correlation | ≤ 0.1319×10−3 | 7.2 (10) | 36.6 (16) | 0.001 |
| Kurtosis | ≤0.6805 | 3.0 (3) | 36.6 (23) | 0.366 |
| Skewness | ≤-0.1092 | 19.2 (14) | 29.1 (12) | 0.505 |