Samantha Johnson1, Victoria Strauss2, Camilla Gilmore3, Julia Jaekel4, Neil Marlow5, Dieter Wolke6. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: sjj19@le.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. 4. Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, 1215 West Cumberland Ave., Knoxville, TN 37996, USA; Department of Developmental Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany; Department of Psychology and Health Sciences Research Institute and Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. 5. Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. 6. Department of Psychology and Health Sciences Research Institute and Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children born extremely preterm are at high risk for intellectual disability, learning disabilities, executive dysfunction and special educational needs, but little is understood about the comorbidity of intellectual and learning disabilities in this population. AIMS: This study explored comorbidity in intellectual disability (ID) and learning disabilities (LD) in children born extremely preterm (EP; <26+0weeks' gestation). SUBJECTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A UK national cohort of 161 EP children and 153 term-born controls without neurosensory impairments was assessed at 11years of age (the EPICure Study). OUTCOME MEASURES: IQ, mathematics and reading attainment, executive function, visuospatial processing and sensorimotor skills were assessed using standardised tests, and curriculum-based attainment and special educational needs (SEN) using teacher reports. RESULTS: Overall, 75 (47%) EP children and 7 (4.6%) controls had ID or LD (RR 10.12; 95% CI 4.81, 21.27). Comorbidity in ID/LD was more common among EP children than controls (24% vs. 0%). EP children with comorbid ID/LD had significantly poorer neuropsychological abilities and curriculum-based attainment than EP children with an isolated disability or no disabilities. LD were associated with a 3 times increased risk for SEN. However, EP children with ID alone had poorer neuropsychological abilities and curriculum-based attainment than children with no disabilities, yet there was no increase in SEN provision among this group. CONCLUSIONS: EP children are at high risk for comorbid intellectual and learning disabilities. Education professionals should be aware of the complex nature of EP children's difficulties and the need for multi-domain assessments to guide intervention.
BACKGROUND: Children born extremely preterm are at high risk for intellectual disability, learning disabilities, executive dysfunction and special educational needs, but little is understood about the comorbidity of intellectual and learning disabilities in this population. AIMS: This study explored comorbidity in intellectual disability (ID) and learning disabilities (LD) in children born extremely preterm (EP; <26+0weeks' gestation). SUBJECTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A UK national cohort of 161 EP children and 153 term-born controls without neurosensory impairments was assessed at 11years of age (the EPICure Study). OUTCOME MEASURES: IQ, mathematics and reading attainment, executive function, visuospatial processing and sensorimotor skills were assessed using standardised tests, and curriculum-based attainment and special educational needs (SEN) using teacher reports. RESULTS: Overall, 75 (47%) EP children and 7 (4.6%) controls had ID or LD (RR 10.12; 95% CI 4.81, 21.27). Comorbidity in ID/LD was more common among EP children than controls (24% vs. 0%). EP children with comorbid ID/LD had significantly poorer neuropsychological abilities and curriculum-based attainment than EP children with an isolated disability or no disabilities. LD were associated with a 3 times increased risk for SEN. However, EP children with ID alone had poorer neuropsychological abilities and curriculum-based attainment than children with no disabilities, yet there was no increase in SEN provision among this group. CONCLUSIONS: EP children are at high risk for comorbid intellectual and learning disabilities. Education professionals should be aware of the complex nature of EP children's difficulties and the need for multi-domain assessments to guide intervention.
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Betty R Vohr; Carla M Bann; H Gerry Taylor; Abhik Das; Kathryn E Gustafson; Kimberly Yolton; Victoria E Watson; Jean Lowe; Maria Elena DeAnda; M Bethany Ball; Neil N Finer; Krisa P Van Meurs; Seetha Shankaran; Athina Pappas; Patrick D Barnes; Dorothy Bulas; Jamie E Newman; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Roy J Heyne; Heidi M Harmon; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Ira Adams-Chapman; Andrea Freeman Duncan; Janell Fuller; Yvonne E Vaucher; Tarah T Colaizy; Sarah Winter; Elisabeth C McGowan; Ricki F Goldstein; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Timothy Heeren; Robert M Joseph; Elizabeth N Allred; Thomas M O'Shea; Alan Leviton; Karl C K Kuban Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Silvia Bucci; Francesca Bevilacqua; Chiara De Marchis; Maria Franca Coletti; Simonetta Gentile; Anna Maria Dall'Oglio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390