Literature DB >> 27517180

Retrospective review of outcome post open reduction and K-wire fixation for grade III acromioclavicular joint subluxations.

M Murphy1,2, P Connolly3, P Murphy3, J P McElwain3.   

Abstract

There is controversy about the therapy for grade III acromioclavicular dislocation according to Tossy and Rockwood's classification. We identified 25 patients who underwent acromioclavicular joint wiring for grade III subluxations under the care of a single consultant in the last 5-year period. All patients were asked to fill in a DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire to assess outcome following acromioclavicular joint repair, and their clinical notes were reviewed. Our results show that open reduction and Kirschner- (K) wire fixation of grade III AC joint disruptions results in good strength and range of motion of the affected shoulder. It is associated with DASH scores, which are comparable to those of the general population for the same age, indicating little residual disability. All patients returned to their pre-injury occupation, and all but one returned to previous sporting activities. Complications occurred in four patients, but only one required K-wire repositioning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular; Joint; Kirschner; Outcome; Subluxation

Year:  2004        PMID: 27517180     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-004-0149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  10 in total

1.  [Athletic capacity after surgical management of acromioclavicular joint separation].

Authors:  M Krüger-Franke; T Maurer; B Rosemeyer
Journal:  Sportverletz Sportschaden       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.077

2.  The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  G C Bannister; W A Wallace; P G Stableforth; M A Hutson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11

3.  Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations in professional throwing athletes: results of a survey.

Authors:  E G McFarland; S J Blivin; C B Doehring; L A Curl; C Silberstein
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-11

4.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  [Conservative or surgical therapy of acromioclavicular joint injury--what is reliable? A systematic analysis of the literature using "evidence-based medicine" criteria].

Authors:  H Bäthis; M Tingart; B Bouillon; T Tiling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Conservative treatment of Grade III acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  E M Wojtys; G Nelson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.

Authors:  J D Tossy; N C Mead; H M Sigmond
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Review after five years.

Authors:  J J Dias; R F Steingold; R A Richardson; B Tesfayohannes; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-11

9.  Surgical treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint in the athlete.

Authors:  M Krueger-Franke; C H Siebert; B Rosemeyer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  D M Weinstein; P D McCann; S J McIlveen; E L Flatow; L U Bigliani
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.