| Literature DB >> 27516869 |
Aurélien Kaiser1, Thomas Merckx1, Hans Van Dyck1.
Abstract
Climate alteration is one of the most cited ecological consequences of urbanization. However, the magnitude of this impact is likely to vary with spatial scale. We investigated how this alteration affects the biological fitness of insects, which are especially sensitive to ambient conditions and well-suited organisms to study urbanization-related changes in phenotypic traits. We monitored temperature and relative air humidity in wooded sites characterized by different levels of urbanization in the surroundings. Using a split-brood design experiment, we investigated the effect of urbanization at the local (i.e., 200 × 200 m) and landscape (i.e., 3 × 3 km) scale on two key traits of biological fitness in two closely related butterfly species that differ in thermal sensitivity. In line with the Urban Heat Island concept, urbanization led to a 1°C increase in daytime temperature and an 8% decrease in daytime relative humidity at the local scale. The thermophilous species Lasiommata megera responded at the local scale: larval survival increased twofold in urban compared to rural sites. Urbanized sites tended to produce bigger adults, although this was the case for males only. In the woodland species Pararge aegeria, which has recently expanded its ecological niche, we did not observe such a response, neither at the local, nor at the landscape scale. These results demonstrate interspecific differences in urbanization-related phenotypic plasticity and larval survival. We discuss larval pre-adaptations in species of different ecological profiles to urban conditions. Our results also highlight the significance of considering fine-grained spatial scales in urban ecology.Entities:
Keywords: Developmental plasticity; Lepidoptera; larval survival; microclimate; spatial scale; urbanization
Year: 2016 PMID: 27516869 PMCID: PMC4972237 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Map of the study area in central Belgium depicting the six plots. On the right, an example of the different subplots within a given plot, highlighting the three selected subplots in bold. Rural, semiurban, and urban categories are depicted in green, orange, and red, respectively, with white subplots depicting urbanization degrees that fall outside these three urbanization classes. This figure depicts the two spatial scales (i.e., 200 × 200 m and 3 × 3 km) at which urbanization effects were investigated on climatic variables and on the biological fitness of two butterfly species.
Figure 2Effect of habitat type on nine climatic variables. On the left of each panel, W, A, and O stand for Woodland, Agricultural, and Open vegetation, respectively. The former two represent the sites of origin (i.e., reference) for the butterfly P. aegeria (P) whereas the latter represents the sites of origin for the butterfly L. megera (L). On the right of each panel, R, S, and U stand for Rural, Semiurban, and Urban, respectively. These three categories represent different levels of urbanization at the subplot (i.e., local, 200 × 200 m) scale. For each climatic variable, we show mean values (±SE).
Percentages of larval survival in the butterflies L. megera and P. aegeria at the sites of origin and in plots and subplots characterized by three levels of urbanization
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sites of origin | 72.2 (39/54) | 25.9 (14/54) | 43.1 (22/51) |
| Subplot type | |||
| Rural | 31.5 (34/108) | 41.0 (48/117) | 36.7 (43/117) |
| Semiurban | 45.4 (49/108) | 29.9 (35/117) | 41.9 (49/117) |
| Urban | 62.7 (64/102) | 35.1 (40/114) | 35.0 (41/117) |
| Plot type | |||
| Rural | 57.4 (62/108) | 39.3 (46/117) | 48.7 (57/117) |
| Semiurban | 31.4 (32/102) | 30.7 (35/114) | 28.2 (33/117) |
| Urban | 49.1 (53/108) | 35.9 (42/117) | 36.7 (43/117) |
Total dry mass (mg; mean ± SE) of male and female L. megera and P. aegeria butterflies that developed at the sites of origin (i.e., reference) and in subplots (200 × 200 m) characterized by three levels of urbanization. The number of measured individuals (N) is indicated between brackets
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males | |||
| Sites of origin |
22.2 ± 0.7 |
12.6 ± 1.4 |
14.8 ± 1.0 |
| Rural |
17.2 ± 0.9 |
16.7 ± 0.7 |
15.6 ± 0.8 |
| Semiurban |
17.0 ± 0.9 |
12.9 ± 1.1 |
15.2 ± 0.6 |
| Urban |
19.4 ± 0.6 |
15.9 ± 0.7 |
16.8 ± 1.2 |
| Females | |||
| Sites of origin |
32.3 ± 1.1 |
18.1 ± 1.7 |
19.7 ± 1.1 |
| Rural |
25.9 ± 1.4 |
22.8 ± 1.0 |
22.4 ± 1.1 |
| Semiurban |
28.1 ± 1.1 |
20.7 ± 1.1 |
20.7 ± 1.1 |
| Urban |
28.0 ± 1.2 |
22.9 ± 0.9 |
20.6 ± 1.0 |