Drew Neavin1, Rima Kaddurah-Daouk2, Richard Weinshilboum1. 1. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 200 First Street SW, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, 3552, Blue Zone, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The initial decades of the 21st century have witnessed striking technical advances that have made it possible to detect, identify and quantitatively measure large numbers of plasma or tissue metabolites. In parallel, similar advances have taken place in our ability to sequence DNA and RNA. Those advances have moved us beyond studies of single metabolites and single genetic polymorphisms to the study of hundreds or thousands of metabolites and millions of genomic variants in a single cell or subject. It is now possible to merge and integrate large data sets generated by the use of different "-omics" techniques to increase our understanding of the molecular basis for variation in disease risk and/or drug response phenotypes. OBJECTIVES: This "Brief Review" will outline some of the challenges and opportunities associated with studies in which metabolomic data have been merged with genomics in an attempt to gain novel insight into mechanisms associated with variation in drug response phenotypes, with an emphasis on the application of a pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomic research strategy and with selected examples of the application of that strategy. METHODS: Studies that used pharmacometabolomics to inform and guide pharmacogenomics were reviewed. Clinical studies that were used as the basis for pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomic studies, published in five independent manuscripts, are described briefly. RESULTS: Within these five manuscripts, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic metabolomics approaches were used. Candidate gene and genome-wide approaches that were used in concert with these metabolomic data identified novel metabolite-gene relationships that were associated with drug response phenotypes in these pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomics studies. CONCLUSION: This "Brief Review" outlines the emerging discipline of pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomics in which metabolic profiles are associated with both clinical phenotypes and genetic variants to identify novel genetic variants associated with drug response phenotypes based on metabolic profiles.
INTRODUCTION: The initial decades of the 21st century have witnessed striking technical advances that have made it possible to detect, identify and quantitatively measure large numbers of plasma or tissue metabolites. In parallel, similar advances have taken place in our ability to sequence DNA and RNA. Those advances have moved us beyond studies of single metabolites and single genetic polymorphisms to the study of hundreds or thousands of metabolites and millions of genomic variants in a single cell or subject. It is now possible to merge and integrate large data sets generated by the use of different "-omics" techniques to increase our understanding of the molecular basis for variation in disease risk and/or drug response phenotypes. OBJECTIVES: This "Brief Review" will outline some of the challenges and opportunities associated with studies in which metabolomic data have been merged with genomics in an attempt to gain novel insight into mechanisms associated with variation in drug response phenotypes, with an emphasis on the application of a pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomic research strategy and with selected examples of the application of that strategy. METHODS: Studies that used pharmacometabolomics to inform and guide pharmacogenomics were reviewed. Clinical studies that were used as the basis for pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomic studies, published in five independent manuscripts, are described briefly. RESULTS: Within these five manuscripts, both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic metabolomics approaches were used. Candidate gene and genome-wide approaches that were used in concert with these metabolomic data identified novel metabolite-gene relationships that were associated with drug response phenotypes in these pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomics studies. CONCLUSION: This "Brief Review" outlines the emerging discipline of pharmacometabolomics-informed pharmacogenomics in which metabolic profiles are associated with both clinical phenotypes and genetic variants to identify novel genetic variants associated with drug response phenotypes based on metabolic profiles.
Authors: James N Ingle; Daniel J Schaid; Paul E Goss; Mohan Liu; Taisei Mushiroda; Judy-Anne W Chapman; Michiaki Kubo; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Lois Shepherd; Joseph Pater; Liewei Wang; Matthew J Ellis; Vered Stearns; Daniel C Rohrer; Matthew P Goetz; Kathleen I Pritchard; David A Flockhart; Yusuke Nakamura; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Y Ji; S Hebbring; H Zhu; G D Jenkins; J Biernacka; K Snyder; M Drews; O Fiehn; Z Zeng; D Schaid; D A Mrazek; R Kaddurah-Daouk; R M Weinshilboum Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jacob P R Jacobsen; Per Plenge; Benjamin D Sachs; Alan L Pehrson; Manuel Cajina; Yunzhi Du; Wendy Roberts; Meghan L Rudder; Prachiti Dalvi; Taylor J Robinson; Sharon P O'Neill; King S Khoo; Connie Sanchez Morillo; Xiaodong Zhang; Marc G Caron Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: J P Lewis; L M Yerges-Armstrong; S Ellero-Simatos; A Georgiades; R Kaddurah-Daouk; T Hankemeier Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: James N Ingle; Mohan Liu; D Lawrence Wickerham; Daniel J Schaid; Liewei Wang; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Joseph P Costantino; Victor G Vogel; Soonmyung Paik; Matthew P Goetz; Matthew M Ames; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Erin E Carlson; David A Flockhart; Norman Wolmark; Yusuke Nakamura; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Christian Gieger; Ludwig Geistlinger; Elisabeth Altmaier; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Meitinger; Hans-Werner Mewes; H-Erich Wichmann; Klaus M Weinberger; Jerzy Adamski; Thomas Illig; Karsten Suhre Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: L M Yerges-Armstrong; S Ellero-Simatos; A Georgiades; H Zhu; J P Lewis; R B Horenstein; A L Beitelshees; A Dane; T Reijmers; T Hankemeier; O Fiehn; A R Shuldiner; R Kaddurah-Daouk Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M Gupta; D Neavin; D Liu; J Biernacka; D Hall-Flavin; W V Bobo; M A Frye; M Skime; G D Jenkins; A Batzler; K Kalari; W Matson; S S Bhasin; H Zhu; T Mushiroda; Y Nakamura; M Kubo; L Wang; R Kaddurah-Daouk; R M Weinshilboum Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Ahmed T Ahmed; Siamak MahmoudianDehkordi; Sudeepa Bhattacharyya; Matthias Arnold; Duan Liu; Drew Neavin; M Arthur Moseley; J Will Thompson; Lisa St John Williams; Gregory Louie; Michelle K Skime; Liewei Wang; Patricio Riva-Posse; William M McDonald; William V Bobo; W Edward Craighead; Ranga Krishnan; Richard M Weinshilboum; Boadie W Dunlop; David S Millington; A John Rush; Mark A Frye; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Duan Liu; Balmiki Ray; Drew R Neavin; Jiabin Zhang; Arjun P Athreya; Joanna M Biernacka; William V Bobo; Daniel K Hall-Flavin; Michelle K Skime; Hongjie Zhu; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Krishna R Kalari; Felix Boakye-Agyeman; Wayne R Matson; Swati S Bhasin; Taisei Mushiroda; Yusuke Nakamura; Michiaki Kubo; Ravishankar K Iyer; Liewei Wang; Mark A Frye; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Lisa St John-Williams; Colette Blach; Jon B Toledo; Daniel M Rotroff; Sungeun Kim; Kristaps Klavins; Rebecca Baillie; Xianlin Han; Siamak Mahmoudiandehkordi; John Jack; Tyler J Massaro; Joseph E Lucas; Gregory Louie; Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Shannon L Risacher; Andrew J Saykin; Gabi Kastenmüller; Matthias Arnold; Therese Koal; M Arthur Moseley; Lara M Mangravite; Mette A Peters; Jessica D Tenenbaum; J Will Thompson; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Duan Liu; Yongxian Zhuang; Lingxin Zhang; Huanyao Gao; Drew Neavin; Tania Carrillo-Roa; Yani Wang; Jia Yu; Sisi Qin; Daniel C Kim; Erica Liu; Thanh Thanh Le Nguyen; Joanna M Biernacka; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Boadie W Dunlop; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg; Elisabeth B Binder; Mark A Frye; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Isaac V Cohen; Elizabeth T Cirulli; Matthew W Mitchell; Thomas J Jonsson; James Yu; Naisha Shah; Tim D Spector; Lining Guo; J Craig Venter; Amalio Telenti Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 8.143