Sarah M Bauer1, Alan B McGuire2, Marina Kukla2, Shannon McGuire3, Matthew J Bair4, Marianne S Matthias5. 1. VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: smbauer.psych@gmail.com. 2. VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute, INC., Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute, INC., Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Communications Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Goal setting is a common element of self-management support programs; however, little is known about the nature of patients' goals or how goals change during pain self-management. The purpose of the current study is to explore how patients' goals and views of goal setting change over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. METHODS: Veterans (n=16) completing a 4-month peer-led pain self-management program completed semi-structured interviews at baseline and follow-up regarding their goals for their pain. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization. RESULTS: Analyses revealed six themes: motivation to do something for their pain, more goal-oriented, actually setting goals, clarity of goal importance, more specific/measurable goal criteria, and more specific/measurable strategies. CONCLUSION: The current analyses illustrate how participants' goals can evolve over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. Specifically, increased motivation, more openness to using goals, greater clarity of goal importance, more specific and measurable goals and strategies, and the influence of the peer coach relationship were described by participants. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pain self-management interventions should emphasize goal setting, and development of specific, measurable goals and plans. Trainings for providers should address the potential for the provider-patient relationship, particularly peer providers, to facilitate motivation and goal setting.
OBJECTIVE: Goal setting is a common element of self-management support programs; however, little is known about the nature of patients' goals or how goals change during pain self-management. The purpose of the current study is to explore how patients' goals and views of goal setting change over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. METHODS: Veterans (n=16) completing a 4-month peer-led pain self-management program completed semi-structured interviews at baseline and follow-up regarding their goals for their pain. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization. RESULTS: Analyses revealed six themes: motivation to do something for their pain, more goal-oriented, actually setting goals, clarity of goal importance, more specific/measurable goal criteria, and more specific/measurable strategies. CONCLUSION: The current analyses illustrate how participants' goals can evolve over the course of a peer-led pain self-management program. Specifically, increased motivation, more openness to using goals, greater clarity of goal importance, more specific and measurable goals and strategies, and the influence of the peer coach relationship were described by participants. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pain self-management interventions should emphasize goal setting, and development of specific, measurable goals and plans. Trainings for providers should address the potential for the provider-patient relationship, particularly peer providers, to facilitate motivation and goal setting.
Authors: Teresa M Damush; Morris Weinberger; Susan M Perkins; Jaya K Rao; William M Tierney; Rong Qi; Daniel O Clark Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-11-24
Authors: Regina M Leadley; Nigel Armstrong; Kim J Reid; Alex Allen; Kate V Misso; Jos Kleijnen Journal: Pain Pract Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Marianne S Matthias; Alan B McGuire; Marina Kukla; Joanne Daggy; Laura J Myers; Matthew J Bair Journal: Pain Med Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: K R Lorig; D S Sobel; A L Stewart; B W Brown; A Bandura; P Ritter; V M Gonzalez; D D Laurent; H R Holman Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 2.983