Shea M Lemley1, Brent A Kaplan2, Derek D Reed3, Alexandria C Darden4, David P Jarmolowicz5. 1. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States. Electronic address: shea.lemley@ku.edu. 2. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States. Electronic address: bkaplan4@ku.edu. 3. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States. Electronic address: dreed@ku.edu. 4. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States. Electronic address: acdarden@ku.edu. 5. Department of Applied Behavioral Science and Problem Gambling Research and Education Support System (ProGRESS), University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave. Lawrence, KS, 66045, United States. Electronic address: dpj@ku.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol use in college is common, and problematic consequences of alcohol may affect college men and women differently. Approaches within behavioral economics have been used to improve our understanding of alcohol use in college students. METHODS: The current study assessed relations between college students' delay discounting, demand for alcohol, and alcohol problems as measured by the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ). In this study, 80 college drinkers completed a monetary choice questionnaire that assessed delay discounting of money, a novel beer choice questionnaire that evaluated delay discounting of beer, and an alcohol purchase task that measured demand for alcohol. RESULTS: Behavioral economic measures associated with the reinforcer pathologies model (i.e., demand and discounting) predicted alcohol consequences as measured by the YAACQ. For men, these significant predictor variables included money discounting, beer discounting, and intensity of alcohol demand, whereas for women money discounting and essential value were significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the utility of the reinforcer pathologies approach for the study of alcohol use and the importance of considering gender differences in examining college drinking.
BACKGROUND:Alcohol use in college is common, and problematic consequences of alcohol may affect college men and women differently. Approaches within behavioral economics have been used to improve our understanding of alcohol use in college students. METHODS: The current study assessed relations between college students' delay discounting, demand for alcohol, and alcohol problems as measured by the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ). In this study, 80 college drinkers completed a monetary choice questionnaire that assessed delay discounting of money, a novel beer choice questionnaire that evaluated delay discounting of beer, and an alcohol purchase task that measured demand for alcohol. RESULTS: Behavioral economic measures associated with the reinforcer pathologies model (i.e., demand and discounting) predicted alcohol consequences as measured by the YAACQ. For men, these significant predictor variables included money discounting, beer discounting, and intensity of alcohol demand, whereas for women money discounting and essential value were significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the utility of the reinforcer pathologies approach for the study of alcohol use and the importance of considering gender differences in examining college drinking.
Authors: Warren K Bickel; Liqa N Athamneh; Julia C Basso; Alexandra M Mellis; William B DeHart; William H Craft; Derek Pope Journal: Curr Opin Psychol Date: 2019-02-06
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Matthew P Martens; Brian Borsari; Katie Witkiewitz; Lidia Z Meshesha Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2019-05-09
Authors: Samuel F Acuff; Kathryn E Soltis; Ashley A Dennhardt; Kristoffer S Berlin; James G Murphy Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 3.455