Literature DB >> 27515046

Placental insufficiency among high-risk pregnancies with a normal umbilical artery resistance index after 32weeks.

Lut Geerts1, Elrike Van der Merwe2, Anneke Theron3, Kerry Rademan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of abnormal multi-vessel Doppler values among advanced pregnancies at risk of suboptimal placentation but with a normal umbilical artery resistance index (RI), and to assess whether clinical and ultrasonography findings can identify them.
METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional study at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, women with high-risk pregnancies but normal umbilical artery RI after 32weeks underwent ultrasonography (fetal biometry, liquor, and placenta maturation) and Doppler assessment (uterine, umbilical, and middle cerebral arteries) between February 11 and October 21, 2013. Study data were compared among four groups: fetuses with normal uterofetoplacental Doppler values and those with any abnormal pulsatility index, each subdivided into small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) by estimated fetal weight.
RESULTS: Of 210 participants, 72 (36.2%) had abnormal Doppler results, and 60 (28.6%) fetuses were SGA (38 [63.3%] with abnormal Doppler results). Clinical characteristics did not differ between groups with normal or abnormal Doppler values; however, among normal Doppler results, SGA pregnancies demonstrated poorer fundal growth (P=0.006). Significant associations existed between abnormal Doppler results and asymmetric growth, inappropriately advanced placental maturation, and reduced liquor volume (all P≤0.04), but with very low sensitivities (3.9%, 4.8%, and 14.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Maternal characteristics and imaging variables did not reliably identify more than one-third of pregnancies with evidence of suboptimal placentation.
Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; Fetal growth restriction; Third trimester; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27515046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

1.  Antecedents and correlates of blood concentrations of neurotrophic growth factors in very preterm newborns.

Authors:  Alan Leviton; Elizabeth N Allred; Hidemi Yamamoto; Raina N Fichorova; Karl Kuban; T Michael O'Shea; Olaf Dammann
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.861

2.  Classification of intrauterine growth restriction at 34-38 weeks gestation with machine learning models.

Authors:  I C Crockart; L T Brink; C du Plessis; H J Odendaal
Journal:  Inform Med Unlocked       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Accelerations of the Fetal Heart Rate in the Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction at 34-38 Week's Gestation.

Authors:  H J Odendaal; I C Crockart; C Du Plessis; L Brink; C A Groenewald
Journal:  Glob J Pediatr Neonatal Care       Date:  2021-10-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.