Ozan Kocak1, Coskun Yarar2, Ayşe Bozkurt Turhan3, Olga Meltem Akay4, Kursat Bora Carman2, Ayten Yakut2. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Ilkadim, Samsun, Turkey. ozankocak79@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey. 3. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey. 4. Department of Hematology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is an important cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. The etiology of PAIS remains unknown. Several maternal-neonatal disorders, and especially prothrombotic risk factors, have been reported in infants with perinatal stroke (PS). Rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) can analyze the coagulation system, from the beginning of coagulation, through clot formation, and ending with fibrinolysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypercoagulability state in PAIS patients using ROTEM. METHODS: Patients were obtained by evaluating hospital files retrospectively. Twenty patients with PAIS and 19 healthy controls were included in the study. Prothrombotic risk factors and standard coagulation parameters were collected for all patients. Thromboelastometry (TEM) analysis was performed with the ROTEM® Coagulation Analyzer model Gamma 2500 (Tem International, Munich, Germany). Patients were separated into two groups; Group 1 included PAIS patients with prothrombotic risk factors and Group 2 included patients with no prothrombotic risk factors. RESULTS: Group 1 includes six patients and Group 2 includes fourteen. Maternal risk factors were reported in 55 % and prothrombotic risk factors were detected in 30 % of the patients. ROTEM analyses were done mean age of 11.2 ± 9.4 months. ROTEM analysis showed that maximum clot firmness (MCF) value on both groups was significantly higher than in the control group, which is consistent with a hypercoagulable state. There was no statistical difference between the MCF values of Group 1 and Group 2. No significant correlations were found between the ROTEM parameters and the hematological parameters. CONCLUSION: The etiology of PAIS is still unclear. Prothrombotic risk factors may be an important etiology for PAIS. However, standard hematological tests for evaluating prothrombotic risk factors are limited. In our study, ROTEM analyses showed higher maximum clot firmness in PAIS patients compared to controls. ROTEM analyses may suggest a hypercoagulable state due to abnormal fibrinolysis in PAIS patients. Normative data and further research is needed to validate our findings.
BACKGROUND: Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is an important cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. The etiology of PAIS remains unknown. Several maternal-neonatal disorders, and especially prothrombotic risk factors, have been reported in infants with perinatal stroke (PS). Rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) can analyze the coagulation system, from the beginning of coagulation, through clot formation, and ending with fibrinolysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypercoagulability state in PAIS patients using ROTEM. METHODS:Patients were obtained by evaluating hospital files retrospectively. Twenty patients with PAIS and 19 healthy controls were included in the study. Prothrombotic risk factors and standard coagulation parameters were collected for all patients. Thromboelastometry (TEM) analysis was performed with the ROTEM® Coagulation Analyzer model Gamma 2500 (Tem International, Munich, Germany). Patients were separated into two groups; Group 1 included PAIS patients with prothrombotic risk factors and Group 2 included patients with no prothrombotic risk factors. RESULTS: Group 1 includes six patients and Group 2 includes fourteen. Maternal risk factors were reported in 55 % and prothrombotic risk factors were detected in 30 % of the patients. ROTEM analyses were done mean age of 11.2 ± 9.4 months. ROTEM analysis showed that maximum clot firmness (MCF) value on both groups was significantly higher than in the control group, which is consistent with a hypercoagulable state. There was no statistical difference between the MCF values of Group 1 and Group 2. No significant correlations were found between the ROTEM parameters and the hematological parameters. CONCLUSION: The etiology of PAIS is still unclear. Prothrombotic risk factors may be an important etiology for PAIS. However, standard hematological tests for evaluating prothrombotic risk factors are limited. In our study, ROTEM analyses showed higher maximum clot firmness in PAIS patients compared to controls. ROTEM analyses may suggest a hypercoagulable state due to abnormal fibrinolysis in PAIS patients. Normative data and further research is needed to validate our findings.
Authors: Janet Lee; Lisa A Croen; Camilla Lindan; Kendall B Nash; Cathleen K Yoshida; Donna M Ferriero; A J Barkovich; Yvonne W Wu Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Valeria Rossetto; Luca Spiezia; Marco Senzolo; Kryssia I Rodriguez-Castro; Sara Maggiolo; Paolo Simioni Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Rachel M Edwards; Bindi Jayendra Naik-Mathuria; Andre Nicholas Gay; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Jun Teruya Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.493