Literature DB >> 27514740

Lessons learned from nurses' requests for ethics consultation: Why did they call and what did they value?

Virginia L Bartlett1, Stuart G Finder1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An ongoing challenge for clinical ethics consultation is learning how colleagues in other healthcare professions understand, make use of, and evaluate clinical ethics consultation services. AIM: In pursuing such knowledge as part of clinical ethics consultation service quality assessment, clinical ethics consultation services can learn important information about the issues and concerns that prompt colleagues to request ethics consultation. Such knowledge allows for greater outreach, education, and responsiveness by clinical ethics consultation services to the concerns of clinician colleagues.
DESIGN: This quality assessment project explores consultation requests and follow-up questionnaire responses voluntarily submitted from nurses who requested clinical ethics consultation. We present qualitative data analyzed using content analysis and constant comparison methods to identify key concerns that prompted requests as well as common themes among nurse requestors' evaluations of what was most important in clinical ethics consultations. Participants and context: A total of 41 nurses requesting clinical ethics consultation and 15 who returned the follow-up questionnaire. Ethical considerations: Our Office of Research Compliance and Quality Improvement determined that our project was not considered human subjects research and so did not require institutional review board approval or exemption. However, efforts were made to avoid any sense of coercion and all data were de-identified prior to analysis.
FINDINGS: Our analysis revealed six main categories of issues that prompted nurses' requests for ethics consultation, as well as unifying themes around nurses' experiences, advocacy, and family support while caring for patients in the intersections of patients, families, and physicians. DISCUSSION: The insights gained from analyzing nurses' requests for and responses to clinical ethics consultation may serve as a resource for clinical ethics consultation services seeking to identify, respond to, and educate regarding issues of importance to nurse colleagues and may be a resource for nursing administrators and leadership seeking to identify and address common ethical issues nurses face.
CONCLUSION: Ongoing work on clinical ethics consultation service quality improvement and engagement with our nursing colleagues about their concerns prompting-and their evaluations of-clinical ethics consultation are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical ethics; ethics and leadership/management; moral/ethical climate of organizations; professional ethics; qualitative analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27514740     DOI: 10.1177/0969733016660879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Marina Salis; Eryn Tong; Erica Nekolaichuk; Claudia Barned; Andria Bianchi; Daniel Z Buchman; Kevin Rodrigues; Ruby R Shanker; Ann M Heesters
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.834

2.  On Best Interests: A Case for Clinical Ethics Consultation.

Authors:  Karen O Moss; Robert Guerin; Olubukunola Mary Dwyer; Celia E Wills; Barbara Daly
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.131

3.  Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon; Yun Ting Ong; Hong Wei Yap; Kuang Teck Tay; Elijah Gin Lim; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Wei Qiang Lim; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Ying Pin Toh; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Identifying disincentives to ethics consultation requests among physicians, advance practice providers, and nurses: a quality improvement all staff survey at a tertiary academic medical center.

Authors:  Lynette Cederquist; Jamie Nicole LaBuzetta; Edward Cachay; Lawrence Friedman; Cassia Yi; Laura Dibsie; Yiran Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.