Literature DB >> 27514278

FES-induced co-activation of antagonist muscles for upper limb control and disturbance rejection.

Antônio Padilha L Bó1, Lucas O da Fonseca2, Ana Carolina C de Sousa2.   

Abstract

Control systems for human movement based on Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) have shown to provide excellent performance in different experimental setups. Nevertheless, there is still a limited number of such applications available today on worldwide markets, indicating poor performance in real settings, particularly for upper limb rehabilitation and assistance. Based on these premises, in this paper we explore the use of an alternative control strategy based on co-activation of antagonist muscles using FES. Although co-contraction may accelerate fatigue when compared to single-muscle activation, knowledge from motor control indicate it may be useful for some applications. We have performed a simulation and experimental study designed to evaluate whether controllers that integrate such features can modulate joint impedance and, by doing so, improving performance with respect to disturbance rejection. The simulation results, obtained using a novel model including proprioceptive feedback and anatomical data, indicate that both stiffness and damping components of joint impedance may be modulated by using FES-induced co-activation of antagonist muscles. Preliminary experimental trials were conducted on four healthy subjects using surface electrodes. While the simulation investigation predicted a maximum 494% increase in joint stiffness for wrist flexion/extension, experiments provided an average elbow stiffness increase of 138% using lower stimulation intensity. Closed-loop experiments in which disturbances were applied have demonstrated that improved behavior may be obtained, but increased joint stiffness and other issues related to simultaneous stimulation of antagonist muscles may indeed produce greater errors.
Copyright © 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-activation; FES control; Neuroprosthetics; Reaching movements; Stiffness estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27514278     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  3 in total

1.  Holding Static Arm Configurations With Functional Electrical Stimulation: A Case Study.

Authors:  Derek N Wolf; Eric M Schearer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Whole-Body Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation Kinesitherapy Can Promote the Restoring of Physiological Muscle Synergies for Neurological Patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Scano; Robert Mihai Mira; Guido Gabbrielli; Franco Molteni; Viktor Terekhov
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Post-Stroke Treatment with Neuromuscular Functional Electrostimulation of Antagonistic Muscles and Kinesiotherapy Evaluated with Electromyography and Clinical Studies in a Two-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Juliusz Huber; Katarzyna Kaczmarek; Katarzyna Leszczyńska; Przemysław Daroszewski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.